PhilGeis
Forum Replies Created
-
What is the product and propellant?
-
This risks inhalation - so please use a robust system. Suggest a formaldehyde releaser but please not the clean beauty natural stuff.
-
Masks are quasi leave on - not appropriate for isothiazoloinones and the CMIT is not stable > 7 pH
-
What’s pH?
-
You should start with irradiated clay and supplement with more water soluble preservatives - glycols, organic acids if pH works. What’s your water quality?
CoA <100cfu/ml ? How did they treat the stuff?
-
The sales brochure offers preserved formulae @ pH’s inconsistent with expected range of effect. Think these folks know nothing of preservation. Consider it as a surfactant, not for any preservation potential.
-
Because the label says “deodorant”, is packaged like one and kooks like one. There’s no test it must satisfy. Caveat emptor, esp. with graillotion’s observation.
-
been a while since I’ve done net weights. Start here https://www.nist.gov/document/08-appa-11-hb133-finalpdf
-
What is pH of product
-
Dave’s book is excellent - and you’re right - the best preservative is good GMP’s. As Rich Hennessy - an old pal and one of the great ancient cosmetics microbiologists - often said - there is no preservative system that the plant can’t screw up.
My fav. example - ZPT 26% saturated solution RM we used for Head & Shoulders needed a preservative.
-
Prefer Glydant+.
and do be prepared to formaldehyde concerns. Exposure is de minimis.
-
Thanks Mike
-
Appreciate your attention to a complicated safety issue.
The primary objective of preservation is to protect the consumer in use - versus microbes introduced during use. Hurdle depends on a series of weak components. Compromise of any one by consumer use, through stability, through any factor compromises preservation. These are common events and hard to control.
Aw is not a relevant metric for some emulsions and getting to 0.7 often leaves product cosmetically diminished.
There is no broad spectrum preservative and do NOT rely in supplier sales literature.. Construct a combination including multiple preservatives - one(s) esp. effective vs bacteria and one(s) esp. effective vs fungi and a chelator - EDTA.
AND use a package that discourages consumer screwing up the product - esp. important for the poor systems that your list/claim describes. If you must chase the clean beauty/natural mythology - please use phenoxyethyl over phenethyl, try some glycols, esp. over the esters.
-
Thanks Mike - what safety parameters do you guys address?
-
Mike - testing for safety. How was that done and how does your oil supplier maintain their quality. That was our concern. Despite assurances, RM quality control found a cigarette butt in one batch. That with occasional chemical excursion killed it. btw - what is the color of your material?
Reference to “fluid” rather than soap. Is that marketing - did you find consumer perception negative to “soap” in this context?
-
That’s very nice, Mike
-
Mike, our effort for hand soap required analytical qualification of every lot and those results indicated lack of quality control despite supplier’s assurances. The primary driver then was cost - as most folks learn, quality is costly. Think one would need to validate supplier’s “process” as with any primary ingredient.
I’d not get carried away with “biodegradability” beyond the ingredient that appeals to a lot of consumers’ perceptions of natural vulnerability in this context. Appreciate that the product has found a niche in this regard.
-
We explored the use of used cooking oil (“yellow grease”) for soap production and abandoned the idea based on lack of assurance of chemical quality. We were working with a well know global fast food chain. Cost was the objective. Many batches were ok, but the frequency batches with chemical quality issues made this an unreliable source.
-
Mike - is the from “yellow grease”?
-
I was asking for the pH of the product and the question was directed at the OP. Please let them answer.
-
Micro quality?
-
like matt said
-
An idea levels in that commercial product? Chloromethyl might be a stability problem at that pH esp. if any free amines. Methyl is good but needs ~100 ppm.
-
I too await the citations. Pretentious claims for natural ingredient safety are typically based on absence of any safety data. As a toxicologist pal commented - “the only totally safe ingredient is the one that no one has tested”.
-
“Hurdle” is a poor preservative approach in consumer use. There’s nothing esp. “intelligent” about it.