Forum Replies Created

Page 40 of 184
  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    March 4, 2021 at 4:32 pm in reply to: Bug food

    Additionally, surfactants, emollients, amino acids, sugars.  Different microbes eat a lot of different things.

    To minimize the problems, use less. Keep pH out of growth range. Reduce water activity. Use closed packaging. Use chelating agents. And use standard, proven effective preservatives. 

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    March 4, 2021 at 2:45 pm in reply to: Why does cream loses 15% water after 2 weeks?

    If you have an open jar at elevated temperatures, you’re going to have a difficult time preventing evaporation (even with humectants).

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    March 4, 2021 at 12:16 am in reply to: Why does cream loses 15% water after 2 weeks?

    Losing 15% (even without humectants) is a large amount. How did you determine that amount?  But the packaging could be a significant problem. Unless it’s an open jar there is no reason you should be losing that much water in such a short amount of time.

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    March 3, 2021 at 11:00 pm in reply to: Why does cream loses 15% water after 2 weeks?

    What type of packaging are you using?

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    March 2, 2021 at 11:08 pm in reply to: Shampoo face rash

    @MarkBroussard - true story: when I was working on the VO5 line our marketing people wanted to launch a body wash. We just took the shampoo formula, adjusted slightly the ratio of SLS / SLES, changed color, fragrance and called it body wash.

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    March 2, 2021 at 8:16 pm in reply to: Shampoo face rash

    @Climatechangeanxiety - because, you know…marketing.

    https://journals.lww.com/dermatitis/Citation/2017/07000/Alkyl_Glucosides__2017__Allergen_of_the_Year_.18.aspx

    They convinced consumers that sulfates were bad and a more “natural” replacement is glucosides. So, they used them for their products. The fact that after a few years of using them glucoside were discovered to be significant allergens isn’t surprising. We have decades of safe use of sulfates. We don’t have decades of safe use of glucosides. 

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    March 2, 2021 at 5:56 pm in reply to: IFSCC Debate 2 - It is better to formulate with natural ingredients?

    @Pharma - great points. I’ll try to work them into questions for the panelists.
    I’ve often thought it may not be a good idea to substitute farm land for cosmetic production.

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    March 2, 2021 at 2:02 pm in reply to: IFSCC Debate 2 - It is better to formulate with natural ingredients?

    Hello @ozgirl - Yes, it will be recorded. As long as you sign up you’ll get an email with a link to the replay.

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    March 1, 2021 at 8:34 pm in reply to: Chelating agents comparison

    @Pharma - Raw material supplier being misleading!?  Say it ain’t so!

    This is a good lesson for everyone though. Raw material supplier data should always be viewed skeptically. Not saying that they outright lie, but they certainly present the data in a way that is more favorable to getting you to come to the conclusions they want. 

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    March 1, 2021 at 4:08 pm in reply to: Shampoo face rash

    @Climatechangeanxiety - adding more is not the best way to go about trying to figure out the problem.  A better strategy would be to do a knockout experiment.

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 28, 2021 at 10:09 pm in reply to: hydroquinone SAFETY

    I don’t believe it is banned in the EU if you have a prescription for it.

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 28, 2021 at 2:43 pm in reply to: guess the percentage of these ingredients

    I agree with @Pharma.  
    I would add that 5% phenoxyethanol is a ridiculously high amount. Typically, it’s not used higher than 1%

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 26, 2021 at 9:44 pm in reply to: Rockstars we are indeed!

    I wish we got paid like rockstars in the industry!  lol

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 26, 2021 at 2:17 pm in reply to: HLB or not?

    It depends on the formula. Usually cosmetic chemists are starting with an existing formula and trying to modify it to make it better/different. So in these cases, no.  But making a completely new formula…it can be helpful, depending on the emulsion system you are using.

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 26, 2021 at 12:29 am in reply to: Help with clarifying what phase to add certain ingredients

    No, Polyquaterniums are not heat sensitive. It’s usually more convenient to add them in the water phase as you heat it. But you can add it to the cool down phase too. That may make it go in the solution more quickly. Although if it is a powder that might cause “fish eyes” (globs of undissolved polymer) so you want to add it early.

    The bottom line is that it depends on the system. But no, polyquats are not heat sensitive.

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 24, 2021 at 1:51 pm in reply to: How to make Dense creamy fluppy Foam for facial Cleanser

    It might help if you told us all the ingredients in your formula if you haven’t yet.  Adding HPMC (methylcellulose) or Guar Hydroxpropyltrimonium chloride may boost the foam. If you have glycerin in your formula that will hurt foam so reduce that level. In the old days we would just use Cocamide DEA which worked great for that but alas, the ingredient has developed a poor reputation.

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 24, 2021 at 1:48 pm in reply to: Good shampoo bar or ???? bar?

    @Margaret - Upfront I should say that this is just a personal opinion. As @JonahRay demonstrates, some people like (or at least tolerate) shampoo bars. For people who do, more power to them. 

    For me personally, I don’t think they deliver enough surfactant for me to feel they are getting hair clean. I don’t think they foam well enough, they are more cumbersome to use, and where they do touch the hair they leave it feeling “dry” or rough.

    Yes, I think the main issue is that they do not deliver enough surfactant. They also do not deliver a consistent formula. While a liquid product can be a homogenous mixture, a bar soap is more like a box of Lucky Charms. In one handful you might get 10 marshmallows while in another handful you might get 2 marshmallows. Similarly, in one use of the shampoo bar you might get some of the panthenol delivered while in another you might get none. 

    But again, this is all just a personal opinion about the bar shampoos. Obviously, some people like them.

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 24, 2021 at 12:51 am in reply to: Good shampoo bar or ???? bar?

    All shampoo bars are crap compared to liquid shampoos. 
    If you keep the comparison to shampoo bars, I don’t know, I’d guess the coco sulfate version would be more effective but with all the oils in the bar, probably not.

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 23, 2021 at 10:36 pm in reply to: Shampoo face rash

    @Climatechangeanxiety - is it just your product that causes the reaction or do you have this reaction with Tom’s of Maine too?  If no reaction with their product, what are the main differences between yours and theirs?

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 19, 2021 at 3:03 pm in reply to: Role of Sodium chloride in emulsion

    Usually sodium chloride will destabilize an emulsion.

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 18, 2021 at 5:20 pm in reply to: About TEWL of petrolatum

    You would have to test it. I don’t think it is a linear scale.

    In case you were curious, here’s a study where you can see how much TEWL petrolatum affects skin. I’m not sure about the percentage they used though. 
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jocd.13163?casa_token=8tk7uwgXaPAAAAAA%3Amx8wnGE2NLHtJXc0ifT5_8tgzpyyl7A5d4SXvNv-la-DSxzelJlzCPH09paGgF8OD3MOjrjRVjCaMzw

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 18, 2021 at 2:05 pm in reply to: PET Testing Vendors

    I believe this company could help you.
    https://microchemlab.com/

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 17, 2021 at 9:06 pm in reply to: What is a “1X” extract?

    @Pharma - Here is a running list of people who took the advice to use homeopathy and died.  http://whatstheharm.net/homeopathy.html 
    There is real harm in following nonsense and pseudoscience when you don’t know that’s what it is.

    For cosmetics, sure homeopathy may not cause any problems like death but let’s not pretend it’s actually doing anything beyond placebo.  Homeopathy is really no different than a belief in Santa Claus 

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 17, 2021 at 8:17 pm in reply to: MARSHMALLOW ROOT

    It’s also worth noting that the FDA specifically says you have to be able to prove the safety of your ingredients and that just because something is natural does not mean it is automatically safe.

    https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-science-research/product-testing-cosmetics#Who_s_responsible

  • OldPerry

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    February 17, 2021 at 6:01 pm in reply to: What is a “1X” extract?

    @Pritishah - With all do respect, Homeopathy is a fairy tale and not a real scientifically based concept. 

    Here is a good place to get started on learning the truth about homeopathy.
    https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/reference/homeopathy/

Page 40 of 184