Home › Cosmetic Science Talk › Formulating › Differences of Leave in and Wash out conditioner
Tagged: formulas, hair-products, ratios
-
Differences of Leave in and Wash out conditioner
Posted by curlmaster211 on November 23, 2020 at 1:53 pmI have been working on what I hope to be a great deep conditioner but I also want to know what else I can do with it.
Currently it is
70% Water + Silk Amino + DL Panthenol
17% Emulsifier + Butter
6% Oil
Honeyquat
Fragrance
Liquid Germall +What ratios or chemicals make the difference between a product you leave in or wash off? They all look the same to me unless it has a surfactantcurlmaster211 replied 3 years, 11 months ago 3 Members · 4 Replies -
4 Replies
-
Honestly, you don’t have any ingredients in your formula that would make this a “great” conditioner. Panthenol, silk amino acids and honeyquat are just claims ingredients.
If you want to make a great conditioner you’ll need a cationic surfactant, cationic polymer and a silicone.
-
Unknown Member
Deleted UserNovember 24, 2020 at 12:05 pm@curlmaster211 The largest difference is usually a wash-off will have a higher % of cationic surfactants and oils, and a higher viscosity, because a lot of it will be washed away and the nature of washing dilutes it on the hair. A leave-on product will have lower oil, surfactant and thickeners so it spreads more easily on the hair and doesn’t appear too heavy when the hair is styled. I have been known to massage a very small amount of wash-off conditioner into the lengths of wet hair as a leave-on treatment!
Leave-on products might also cut out say 2 of 3 cationic emulsifiers - for example if the wash-off product contains cetearyl alcohol, behenyltrimonium chloride and cetrimonium chloride, the leave-on might just use a lower level of behentrimonium chloride and remove the other two. There are also some ingredients which would not stay well attached to the hair if used in a wash-off product, such as UV absorbers, heat protectants or ingredients which give hold (PVP’s, VP/VA Copolymers etc) which might be more suited to a leave-on styling product.
An afterthought: @Perry I wonder if they have included the cationics in the “17% emulsifier + butter” to keep the exact formulation private.
-
Perry said:Honestly, you don’t have any ingredients in your formula that would make this a “great” conditioner. Panthenol, silk amino acids and honeyquat are just claims ingredients.
If you want to make a great conditioner you’ll need a cationic surfactant, cationic polymer and a silicone.
As this is for curly hair, a silicone wouldn’t be in my best interest for todays market but I have been looking into alternative silicones. This was more like a general starting base before I go wild. I just am confused as to what ingredients separate different sorts of conditioner. I don’t know where to start in regards to chem terms.
-
klangridge said:@curlmaster211 The largest difference is usually a wash-off will have a higher % of cationic surfactants and oils, and a higher viscosity, because a lot of it will be washed away and the nature of washing dilutes it on the hair. A leave-on product will have lower oil, surfactant and thickeners so it spreads more easily on the hair and doesn’t appear too heavy when the hair is styled. I have been known to massage a very small amount of wash-off conditioner into the lengths of wet hair as a leave-on treatment!
Leave-on products might also cut out say 2 of 3 cationic emulsifiers - for example if the wash-off product contains cetearyl alcohol, behenyltrimonium chloride and cetrimonium chloride, the leave-on might just use a lower level of behentrimonium chloride and remove the other two. There are also some ingredients which would not stay well attached to the hair if used in a wash-off product, such as UV absorbers, heat protectants or ingredients which give hold (PVP’s, VP/VA Copolymers etc) which might be more suited to a leave-on styling product.
An afterthought: @Perry I wonder if they have included the cationics in the “17% emulsifier + butter” to keep the exact formulation private.
That’s the most help I have been able to receive in weeks, thank you for your take. & you are correct there is a lot going into the conditioner that I left out I just wanted to include the more chemical-y ingredients rather than list all 20+ herbs and butters and whatnots
Log in to reply.