Forum Replies Created

Page 42 of 94
  • @MarkBroussard
    There will be plenty of $$ services to fill the gap.  Be glad they didn’t include a California-style bounty hunter clause.

  • Dont think EWG’s BS will pass but i bet those guys will sell something as shallow but looks better.

  • Prob not
    Section 608 requires Responsible Persons to ensure, and maintain records supporting, “adequate substantiation” showing a cosmetic product is “safe,” and establishes a safety standard that products must meet in order to be marketed in the U.S. MOCRA defines “adequate substantiation of safety” as meaning “tests or studies, research, analyses, or other evidence or information that is considered, among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate the safety of cosmetic products and their ingredients, sufficient to support a reasonable certainty that a cosmetic product is safe.”

    Cosmetic products that do not have adequate safety substantiation will be considered adulterated under section 601 of the FDCA.

  • Part s that do not appl to < 1 mill annually - registration and formal GMP’s.  FDA will develop small business GMP’s.

    Adverse event record keeping, documented safety assessment and labeling change are for everyone.

  • January 25

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 8, 2023 at 10:21 am in reply to: Conditioning shampoo formula

    Why Dermasoft ECO?  It’s a very questionable preservative system - esp. in a shampoo.    

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 7, 2023 at 2:28 pm in reply to: Under FDA’s new Cosmetic Reg. authority

    @GeorgeBenson
    Not yet - FDA has one year to generate.
    I’d look at what’s in Cosm Directive.

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 5, 2023 at 11:34 pm in reply to: Under FDA’s new Cosmetic Reg. authority

    @chemicalmatt
    Did you see any funding for the FDA to cover these new responsibilities.

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 5, 2023 at 9:48 pm in reply to: Under FDA’s new Cosmetic Reg. authority

    @chemicalmatt
    Thanks for the details - what total garbage.

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 5, 2023 at 2:45 pm in reply to: Under FDA’s new Cosmetic Reg. authority

    Right Perry. 
    The big guys and PCPC are all in support - allegedly because it preempts the states.  That mid sized guys are screwed with useless paperwork and administrative burden is just “sad” collateral damage.

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 5, 2023 at 11:30 am in reply to: PH a

    @mikethair
    I’m with you in old - and most hard surface cleaners have an alkaline pH.  Protein is often more soluble at alkaline pH.

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 4, 2023 at 2:36 pm in reply to: Innovation

    You might consider the approach of the major guys - pay attention to the peripheral elements, as simple as they seem - an attractive package: easily manipulated, effective closure that does clog or leak, label that does fade or wash out, that doesn’t leave inaccessible residual product, staged well on shelf; a stable consistent product without phase or color change, syneresis, mold etc. : Support with convincing targeted ads. 
    The big guy’s cost structures demands extensive repeat purchase tro make money - so all the above and more must be consistent through time and geography as cost savings are pursued at all levels.  A true technical innovation consumers can perceive would help a lot but those are very rare in cosmetics.
    For example, P&G did not make money with Pringles until almost a decade after introduction.

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 3, 2023 at 1:41 am in reply to: healing cream

    btw Squinny
    PlantserveE is not enough - you need something for fungi/Gram +’s as Mark said and at a proper pH

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 3, 2023 at 1:35 am in reply to: PH a

    Not within the typical formula range of cosmetics.  

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 2, 2023 at 8:46 pm in reply to: PH a

    Ghita - skin generally takes care of itself.

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 2, 2023 at 3:26 pm in reply to: Incorporating liquid germall plus into anhydrous product

    I understand and appreciate your objective.   It’s a tough one as passive water in open pots/jars has always deviled in use-micro.  

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 2, 2023 at 3:12 pm in reply to: New cosmetic trends for 2023 and beyond

    Bet someone is struggling to get “equity” into their marketing.

    To Perry’s - Cosmetic industry scandal - bet some clown lab will discover “gasp!!” heavy metals or some other trace terrible in something (ala lead in lipstick).  

    Consider the impact of the cosmetic modernization act in US.  Stuffed into the 1.7 trillion, >4000 page omnibus budget act that just passed, it won’t drive a consumer trend but sure will have a lot of industry folks jumping.

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 2, 2023 at 2:39 pm in reply to: Incorporating liquid germall plus into anhydrous product

    Can you say more about the product and the micro risk you’re trying to control?

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    January 2, 2023 at 2:37 pm in reply to: PH a

    This is often overblown.  Skin is not passive in this context, waiting for a product to set its pH.

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    December 31, 2022 at 12:22 pm in reply to: Popular but under-preserved product?

    @ketchito
    Glycerin preservation may have been in the minds of formulators - but I’d not place much confidence in it.

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    December 30, 2022 at 11:47 am in reply to: Popular but under-preserved product?

    @zetein
    Thanks for the additional info 

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    December 29, 2022 at 8:28 pm in reply to: Popular but under-preserved product?

    They may be relying on a hot fill and tube to protect.

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    December 29, 2022 at 3:01 pm in reply to: Popular but under-preserved product?

    I’d not presume effective preservation.

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    December 29, 2022 at 1:50 pm in reply to: Popular but under-preserved product?

    Calamine lotion is a drug - tho could make cosmetic claims.  

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    December 29, 2022 at 11:32 am in reply to: Dilution Calculations for Hydrogen Peroxide 20 Vol

    Concentration x volume = concentration X volume

    What do you mean by “20 vol.”?
    Lose the excessive precision.

Page 42 of 94