[Fekher]

@Abdullah room temperature in same time by manuel mixing with same tool.
@Pharma about acid amino keratin it is another strange phenomenon for the first purchase I worked the formulation with more then 1% level without any issues however in the second purchase even with 0.2% serum loose transparency same thing about the level of perfume I needed to decrease the first level for maintaining the transparency. 

[Fekher]

@Pharma it is not optical ‘illusion actually I put the product in same packaging to jude the transparency and is not the same for sure. C12_15 was suggested by @chemicalmatt for solving transperncy problem when adding perfume in silicone serum, so I made a try for my product and it did lovely job for small batch. 

[Fekher]

@Perry I don’t think soo,  the mixing was manuel by the same tool. 

[Fekher]

@Riyas it is logic to have low foam with such formulation just increase the level of SLES and it will be fine. 

[Fekher]

@fotis83 actually there are a lot of qualities of SLES then for sure you can find safe one. 

[Fekher]

@fotis83 I guess SLES because price / quality  compromise. 

[Fekher]

Thanks a lot @chemicalmatt @ariepfadli for your interesting share. 

[Fekher]

@Abdullah actually i’am looking for Phenyltrimethicone and I will sure add it when it will be available.
 @chemicalmatt  when I added very low level of castor oil even lower then 0.2% the product loose transparency any idea to solve this problem? 

[Fekher]

@chemicalmatt always you have awesome comment thanks a lot. 

[Fekher]

@Paprik I did knock off and it is fragrance.
About ipm it is the opposite of said actually it increases the serum transparency. 

[Fekher]

@ketchito actually I tried many perfums and the issue is the same even at level 0.1%.

[Fekher]

@Abdullah thanks, however don’t you think that less then 1% active surfactant is too weak for removing make up?! 

[Fekher]

@MarkBroussard 1% to 2% as actif mater? 

[Fekher]

@Biocade21 try xanthan gum I guess it can be useful for your system. 

[Fekher]

@Abdullah I guess the capacity of clothes with water can put it to the laundry machine. 

[Fekher]

@Abdullah the general idea is what @ketchito said about your system is not too sensitive to salt but what I suggest is to add some CAPB and CDEA then delating glucoside. 5%  of slat is too much I suggest to start with 0.5% with path 0.1%.

[Fekher]

@Abdullah most important function of Na CL is thickner in detergent, I made a post for Na Cl I guess it is interesting for professional take a look. 

[Fekher]

I guess not @Abdullah 

[Fekher]

@Abdullah thanks a lot may I will try it. 

[Fekher]

@Abdullah nice trick what level you suggest for EDTA? 

[Fekher]

Always together brother???? @Abdullah  actually they are more then thickener both are used as anti-redeposition agents and they have more then that function in detergent. 
  @GeorgeBenson I guess it is low quality product soo far from conventional level. 

[Fekher]

Thanks a lot @Abdullah @Paprik @EVchem for your precious comments wich helped me to have better product by using ceteareth 25 and delating BTMS.
   @Abdullah i’am using acrypol 996 as carbomer and I guess it has some tolerance with BTMS in low level because I made cream with both and it seems pretty stable. 

[Fekher]

@natiyo123 as short answer the main difference in hlb value and even in the final texture try to Google it, it is easy to get more details. 

[Fekher]

 @Abdullah my colleague taked it from professional site, I guess it is not exactly the formulation.

  It was BTMS 25

 No I did not make version without GMS and carbomer

  My plan is to change BTMS with ceteareth 25 I guess it will solve stability problem. 

  Carbomer add a lot for the product so I will try to keep it as much as possible ( If I work only with BTMS Wich has high hlb I guess the hlb of BTMS will be far from needed hlb=10 not?) and for sure with only BTMS I will not reach the good texture get it by using carbomer. 

[Fekher]

@Paprik thanks for your precious opinion and what preservative do you suggest if mine is not adequate? 
Awesome explanation @EVchem