Home Cosmetic Science Talk Formulating Unusual Preservative Testing Results

  • Unusual Preservative Testing Results

    Posted by ozgirl on September 28, 2018 at 4:09 am
    I recently sent some samples of body wash to Schulke for preservative testing including two unpreserved samples and when I got the results back all of the samples (including the unpreserved samples) showed no growth during the test.
    I have seen this before with an unpreserved hair conditioner sample but assumed that the low pH (~4) and all of the cationics including cetrimonium chloride were responsible for that result. The unpreserved shampoo I sent at the same time as the conditioner failed the test.
    Would any of the following ingredients cause the product to essentially be self preserving.
    • Ammonium Lauryl Sulfate
    • Disodium Cocoamphodiproprionate,
    • Cocamidopropyl betaine
    • Plantapon SF (Sodium Cocoamphoacetate, Glycerin, Lauryl Glucoside, Sodium Cocoyl Glutamate, Sodium Lauryl Glucose Carboxylate)
    • Hydrolyzed Wheat Protein
    • Lamesoft PO65 (Coco-glucoside and Glyceryl Oleate)
    • Pearlescent (Glycol Distearate, Laureth-4 and Cocamidopropyl betaine)
    • Polyquaternium-7
    • Citric Acid
    • Fragrance
    • Dissolvine GL
    The pH of the products was 5.5-5.7.
    I still plan on using the preservative but was just surprised by the result.
    ozgirl replied 5 years, 7 months ago 4 Members · 6 Replies
  • 6 Replies
  • Chemist77

    Member
    September 28, 2018 at 6:11 am

    It’s surprising knowing that Schulke does Koko test and which runs for 6 weeks AFAIK. Our support lab does a 4 CC test and so comparatively its more stringent. That list has nothing that can support preservation except Dissolvine chelant which boosts the preservative efficacy. Why don’t you contact S&M and send the LOI to them to let them know if there has been a slip during testing. I might be wrong here but honestly I don’t see anything which can protect the formula from a KOKO test. 

  • Sibech

    Member
    September 28, 2018 at 6:20 am

    The fragrance, depending on composition and concentration, could contribute to preservative efficacy, especially in combination with dissolvine.

  • Chemist77

    Member
    September 28, 2018 at 10:07 am

    Thanks @Sibech, that is an interesting observation. 

  • ozgirl

    Member
    October 1, 2018 at 9:59 pm

    @Chemist77and @Sibechthanks for your thoughts. The fragrance was at low levels so it is probably not the reason for the preservation. I think I will contact Schulke and get their input.

  • DAS

    Member
    October 1, 2018 at 10:31 pm

    CAPB and citric acid could act in synergy with the preservatives the rest of the raw materials already have.

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280920525_Comparison_of_antimicrobial_activity_of_three_commercially_used_quaternary_ammonium_surfactants

  • ozgirl

    Member
    October 1, 2018 at 11:16 pm
    Thanks @DAS . Interesting article.
    I wonder if the CAPB could be working in conjunction with the disodium cocoamphodiproprionate to give this antimicrobial behaviour. The shampoo sample that I sent previously didn’t contain the disodium cocoamphodiproprionate so could be reason that I see this behaviour for these samples.

Log in to reply.