Home Cosmetic Science Talk Formulating Shampoo Formulation Help

  • Shampoo Formulation Help

    Posted by Coscoschemist on August 14, 2025 at 9:27 pm

    Hi,

    I’m a new chemist with a very stubborn client who wants an all natural shampoo that’s as foamy as and dove and as moisturizing as some of the store bought brands. This is my current formulation and I’m having issues with the foam formation and thickness are there any suggestions that I can do to help?

    Decyl Glucoside 3

    Lauryl Glucoside 3

    Lamesoft 65 1

    Disodium Cocoyl Glutamate 4

    CAPB 22

    Hydroxyethylcellulose 0.5

    Sodium Gouconate 0.2

    Argan oil 0.1

    Olive oil 0.1

    Coconut Oil 0.1

    Tocopherol 0.05

    Soap Nut extract 0.05

    Butterfly Pea Powder 0.05

    Essential oils 0.2

    Panthenol 1

    Citric acid 0.12

    Geogard ECT 0.5

    Water qs

    • This discussion was modified 2 weeks, 6 days ago by  Coscoschemist.
    ketchito replied 1 week ago 6 Members · 9 Replies
  • 9 Replies
  • ketchito

    Member
    August 15, 2025 at 7:41 am

    If those are percentages of each raw material (not total active of each), then you’re using too little surfactant content. Also, switch from HEC to HPMC. I’d also rethink the preservative system you’re using, replace Lamesoft by a water soluble cationic polymer like PQ-10.

    • Coscoschemist

      Member
      August 15, 2025 at 9:08 am

      Yes, they are just of the RM not ASM I thought I was within spec but I’ve been tweaking it slightly for a bit so maybe I’ve fallen out. Would the usage for PQ-10 be roughly the same as the lamesoft?

    • ketchito

      Member
      August 28, 2025 at 9:13 am

      PQ-10 and Lamesoft work and feel differently. The first works more as a softening agent and the latter, an emollient (lubricant). If I had to choose between them, I’d choose PQ-10 since it deposits more at lower concentrations, and its effect is more percievable.

  • Fekher

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    August 15, 2025 at 7:51 am

    why using three vegtables oils?

    1) For marketing reason no need to reach such level they may effect( reduce) the foam
    2) To have benefits , this level in rinse off will not add anything.

    • Coscoschemist

      Member
      August 15, 2025 at 9:06 am

      Yes, unfortunately the client wants these oils in the formulation (specifically stated they wanted these 😔) same with the soapnut and butterfly pea powder. Should I reduce it down by half?

      • Fekher

        Professional Chemist / Formulator
        August 15, 2025 at 9:55 am

        As start point not bad and even lower.

  • mikethair

    Professional Chemist / Formulator
    August 16, 2025 at 6:26 pm

    My approach to producing an all-natural shampoo is different from most. I saponified coconut oil to produce a foaming and very cleansing shampoo. I have now retired in 2004, but produced and exported my shampoo globally from 2006 until 2024.

    And the process was simple. Saponify good-quality coconut oil, and add high-quality essential oils for fragrance.

  • ozgirl

    Member
    August 18, 2025 at 5:25 pm

    What are your clients limitations on surfactants? Glucosides are difficult to thicken and aren’t great with foaming. The easiest option is to look for anionic surfactants that you can thicken with salt or CAPB.

  • evchem2

    Member
    August 26, 2025 at 7:48 am

    good points made here already. I’d echo dropping glucosides. You can have a well-performing shampoo that doesn’t rely on sulfates (not sure I’d say ‘all natural’, try looking up other discussions on this site about that), but I’ve seen many customers willing to let go of the product performance/claims once they see the cost difference. That said, you could try specific amino-acid based surfactants like glycinates which should still have some salt thickening response- check out Ajinomoto literature/ example formulations. Make sure your pH is right for whatever aa surfactant you choose- you’d probably have to swap geogard for something else with glycinates, they work best at pH 7+. If you aren’t willing to change pH this paper mentions a sarcosinate/CAPB blend you could try. https://aocs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1007/s11743-015-1683-9

Log in to reply.