Home › Cosmetic Science Talk › Formulating › Pq10 vs pq7 vs cationic guar for hair combing
Tagged: combing, conditioning, shampoo
-
Pq10 vs pq7 vs cationic guar for hair combing
Posted by abdullah on November 21, 2020 at 12:47 pmIn a Shampoo with SLES, CAPB and APG surfactants, which one of these conditioning agent is better for wet and dry combing of hair?
Polyquaternium 10
Polyquaternium 7
Guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chlorideabdullah replied 3 years ago 3 Members · 5 Replies -
5 Replies
-
@Abdullah While the three of them work better at reducing charge density which is more perceivable at static reduction under dry conditions, PQ-10 and Guar HPTC are modified polysaccharides that form a rigid film on hair, while PQ-7 being a copolymer, has more degree of freedom. What I mean is that even though the three are more for dry effect on hair, PQ-7 has a little influence on wet combing as well. Nevertheless, silicones are superior on both wet and dry combing, and can be used alongside (except cationic silicones) or replacing them.
-
@Abdullah It depends on your formulation. If you have a stabilizer (like some Carbopol), then you can use fluid Dimethicone (I’d go for a 350 or 1000 cst viscosity). But if not, a Dimethiconol emulsion can also perform well (only, the deposit will be less). For instance, DC 1784 or 1785 can be used.
-
I’ve never been able to demonstrate a difference. It’s one of those things you have to test yourself in your system.
Log in to reply.