Home › Cosmetic Science Talk › Formulating › Cosmetic Industry › Micellar Water Another weird LOI
Tagged: cosmetic industry, ingredients
-
Micellar Water Another weird LOI
Posted by EVchem on December 14, 2018 at 3:13 pmI’m supposed to reverse engineer this product, a Garnier Micellar water.
Here’s the ingredients if you don’t open the link:Water,
Hexylene Glycol,
Glycerin,
Disodium Cocoamphodiacetate,
Disodium EDTA,
Poloxamer 184,
Polyaminopropyl Biguanide,
F.I.L#B162919/3I think the ingredients are fine, but what’s weird to me is the numbers before water and the F.I.L#. Is this an internal company thing for Garnier? Why would these be listed in-line with the ingredients? I haven’t been in this industry long so I haven’t seen that before. Does anyone know what this is?
EVchem replied 5 years, 10 months ago 10 Members · 15 Replies -
15 Replies
-
I don’t know what that code is. Here are some possibilities
1. The lot number of the production run - so they can track the batch
2. The lot number of the label
3. Printing mistakeThe 695899 number may be a thing that Publix puts on its web entries. I haven’t found it in other places.
-
As @Perry points out, almost certain it is the batch reference.
-
Aw, I had hoped for another magical mystery LOI, but no such luck. :joy:
-
@EVchem Based on the location and the hard print into the label (found it on the packaging with a google search) I find it unlikely to be a batch number, there are actual numbers printed on top of the label for that.I think it is an internal number for L’oreal, There are 2 numbers, the F.I.L # and the initial number. Speculation here, but So the first number could be a lot number for the label as @Perry suggests or a formulation versioning number.BTW, The actual packaging has the number prepending the Ingredients: so it’s not actually written as part of the Ingredients, but the website got it down wrongly.
-
That’s a good thing to remind people about.
Websites get ingredient lists wrong on occasion.
-
Yeah that’s true, on the product I have though it does actually list the numbers in the ingredients list:
-
I honestly think this is just a screw-up where they included some internal numbers and no one on the label review committee caught it.
-
@Perry I don’t think it was a mistake, just Google L’oreal Ingredients and take a look at the images. The numbers are consistently present (albeit usually prepending Ingredients: )
-
I bought a Garnier product a few years ago that listed “ROPYLENE GLYCOL” in the ingredients list so it definitely could be an error.But I think as others have suggested it is probably a formulation identification number.
-
Contact them and tell them you’ve never hear of an ingredient called FIL. Maybe they’ll tell you exactly what it is. I’m intrigued by this.
-
Folks: this IS a L’Oreal (Garnier’s parent) thing. They add their reference # to the labels quite often. Ignore.
-
Are you going to use a GC-MS for reverse engineering? have they given you the funds?
-
haha no they would definitely not spare the money. I think I misused the terminology, it’s not an exact reverse engineer, they just want something similar so I’m going by LOI and knowledge of the ingredients.
Log in to reply.