I doubt that the CBD is “75% potent” as this is really not how they report the testing. Somewhere I have a testing report from a lab in Oregon. If I can find it I will redact it and post later. Essentially it delineates the CBD per a volume of extract and the THC in a volume of extract. You then have to use this known extract breakdown to get the final concentration in the finished product. Without this testing result, the calculations are inaccurate and difficult.
If you are going to do a product with any credibility, you must have a consistent product. My issue here is that on the surface we want to treat it as a credible medical product. If you want to do so you must treat the entire process as a quasi-pharmaceutical across the board. If you are not 100% behind this, just put in a small amount for label copy and move on.
If you treat it as a credible product, you will need to use standard Pharmaceutical calculations. There are numerous resources to learn these online. I could weigh-in to help initially, but this is a skill you MUST learn as well. The difficulty in solving this immediately is that you don’t have all the factors. Essentially you have “solve for Y using X.” We know what Y should be, but you have no definition of X (the composition of the extract).
Lastly, “This does not stop people for wanting to jump on the band wagon of a public trend right now,” is not the greatest argument to put forth. In my opinion, the people who will persevere in this Industry are the ones which do it right at the level of a credible product. Remember, lemmings running off a cliff into the ocean are also “following a popular public trend.”