Home Cosmetic Science Talk Formulating Hair cond - any advice

  • Hair cond - any advice

    Posted by Anonymous on June 13, 2016 at 11:44 am

    Hi. I am trying to make a natural as can be hair conditioner and have the following recipe. Can you let me know if you can see any ‘problems’ or anything missing?
    Also, would adding Guar gum add anything extra?

    Conditioning Emulsifier (BEHENTRIMONIUM
    METHOSULFATE) Filtered Water, Geogard Ultra, Hydrolysed Oats, DL Panthenol
    ( Pro-Vitamin
    B5), Lemon Myrtle Essential Oil

    mikethair replied 8 years, 5 months ago 9 Members · 18 Replies
  • 18 Replies
  • Bobzchemist

    Member
    June 13, 2016 at 2:02 pm

    Why are you trying to make a “natural as can be” conditioner?

  • OldPerry

    Member
    June 13, 2016 at 3:08 pm

    The answer really depends on a few things.

    1.  What do you consider natural? There is nothing natural about Behentrimonium Methosulfate. And while Geogard Ultra is approved under the Ecocert standards the Sodium Benzoate is strictly produced via synthetic chemistry.

    2.  What do you want the conditioner to do? How is the hair supposed to feel? What is your benchmark you are trying to meet?

    Panthenol won’t do much that would be noticeable to consumers.  Hydrolysed oats probably won’t either as they are water soluble and will just rinse away.

    Based on the ingredient list you provided this formula won’t have much conditioning. 

  • Anonymous

    Guest
    June 14, 2016 at 7:22 am

    I want to offer people who use shampoo bars (high ph) to use a conditioner that will put the hair follicles down again. By ‘natural as possible’ I am talking about toxicity and have used http://www.ewg.org/skindeep/ingredient/700658/BEHENTRIMONIUM_METHOSULFATE/
    to give me a rate on ingredient toxicity.
    Can you suggest any addition that would leave the hair soft and smooth that would have a low toxicity?

  • Microformulation

    Member
    June 14, 2016 at 11:40 am

    Good lord, an EWG reference.

  • BartJ

    Member
    June 14, 2016 at 11:41 am

    Hi maddies,

    As someone who went through the period of ‘crafting’ in his path to become a formulator, I hope I can be the right person to give you information.

    You seem like you mean well and you’re also making logical conclusions, which is great. You know that high pH of a soap bar is unsuitable for hair and you try to counteract this. This is a good attitude.

    However, it is all faux-science…. 
    Why would you serve someone’s hair with the wrong product in the first place? Hair products are meant to have low pH, precisely to avoid the problem.

    As to you conditioner. If counteracting the high pH is your main goal, then low pH is your answer. Citric acid?

    Better still if you start taking steps towards creating a correct shampoo product. You are already working with a water based product that requires preservatives. In that instance you seem to be ready to step away from anhydrous shampoo and make a proper one. (this discussion board holds an enourmous amount of info on shampoo formulation)

    P.S. EWG is cancer on the world of cosmetic chemistry.
    It’s an affiliate marketing website styled up as a scientific authority. You may be forced one day to formulate a product congruent with it’s message but that for marketing purposes. As a person learning chemistry you must avoid it at all cost.
    Replace it with: CIR , SCCS , IFRA + your national regulator.

    P.P.S. For basic formulating instructions (includes posts covering the topics you’re working on now) -> search: Swift Crafty Monkey

    And on a final personal note. Even in my soap making days I refused to create any shampoo bars precisely because I would not ignore the issues listed above. This could be the reason why I am where I am today. 

  • Microformulation

    Member
    June 14, 2016 at 11:50 am

    Behentromonium Methosulfate is derived from Rapeseed. It is allowed under many of the Natural standards.
    Funny enough, even EWG gives it a “one”, nearly their lowest level of “toxicity.” I would avoid even using the term “toxic” as any ingredient (even one as innocuous as water) can show toxicity if the dose is high enough. Toxicity is a broad term and is generally more dependent upon dose than the material.
    Lastly, just because it is “natural” doesn’t mean it is safer. Comply with a Natural standard but remember that “natural: is only one factor in being successful. You must meet a certain price point as determined by your market and it must perform.
    Don’t try to make a “natural as can be” product at the detriment of price and performance. That is marketing, not formulating.

  • Anonymous

    Guest
    June 15, 2016 at 1:35 am

    At last, some very helpful, non judgemental advice. THANK YOU so very much, I really appreciate those who have taken the time to lay out the issues both pro and con in a helpful way.
    Are there any formulators based in Australia here? Would like to talk about the possibility of formulating according to Aust standards.

  • Anonymous

    Guest
    June 15, 2016 at 11:37 am

    Thinking of adding some Guar Conditioner and if I wanted to add some coconut oil for ‘conditioning’ would it need to be fractionated coconut oil?

  • OldPerry

    Member
    June 15, 2016 at 4:01 pm

    Guar would provide some conditioning. It is more frequently used in cleansing formulas but I’ve seen it in conditioners.  For coconut oil, I doubt you would notice much difference in the type of coconut oil you use.

  • ozgirl

    Member
    June 16, 2016 at 4:09 am

    @maddies There are a couple of formulators on this forum that are from Australia (myself included).
    Here are some websites that might be of interest in learning about how cosmetics are regulated in Australia.

    https://www.nicnas.gov.au/chemical-information/cosmetics-and-soaps
    https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2008C00244
    https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2013C00556
    http://www.productsafety.gov.au/content/index.phtml/tag/ingredientslabelling

    Also check out http://swiftcraftymonkey.blogspot.com.au/ for some great information on formulating conditioners.

  • Anonymous

    Guest
    June 16, 2016 at 7:16 am

    Thank you Perry and ozgirl!

    Ozgirl, do you send your formulas to any labs in Aust for testing? Have you used Geogard Ultra in conditioner before as a preservative? If so, at what percentage?

  • David08848

    Member
    June 16, 2016 at 3:00 pm

    I have followed Swiftcraftymonkey for quite a while and admire her fearless approach to making cosmetics.  Although she does do a great deal of research and does her best to formulate she is still a hobbyist and not a cosmetic chemist (and neither am I!) so take that into consideration when you read her blog.  I have seen some great stuff on her site but also a few attempts that, although may work very well, are not aesthetically pleasing.  However, I do encourage you to go to her blog but keep in mind what I am said.

  • ozgirl

    Member
    June 16, 2016 at 10:24 pm

    @maddies We do all of our physical stability testing ourselves but there are labs out there that can do this for you. I am not sure what your situation is (homecrafter, small business etc?) but maybe check out New Directions as they offer these services.

    I have not tried Geogard Ultra in a conditioner so unfortunately I cannot offer any advice on usage levels.

  • mikethair

    Member
    June 23, 2016 at 8:49 am

    @BartJ is there any reason you would conclude “You know that high pH of a soap bar is unsuitable for hair” ?

    We have been producing various recipes of liquid soap for a few years under our own label and for OEM customers that we call a “shampoo,” and it is popular with consumers. The pH of these products ranges from 9.5 to 10.0.

  • Bill_Toge

    Member
    June 23, 2016 at 1:01 pm

    @mikethair at that pH, your customers could also use it to get their dishes sparkling clean

  • belassi

    Member
    June 23, 2016 at 2:53 pm
  • mikethair

    Member
    June 24, 2016 at 1:48 am

    @Belassi …..not sure where your quote has come from, but has not been our experience. Most people rinse their thoroughly after shampooing, and none of our customers  (our production capacity is 10,000 x 250 mL bottles/month) have reported calcium salt precipitates plus opaque/tangled hair.

    If the customer demand wasn’t there, we wouldn’t produce this shampoo, its that simple. Generally we are on the back foot trying to keep up with demand. One point though, this shampoo does not suit all hair types, but that proably applies to any shampoo.

  • mikethair

    Member
    June 24, 2016 at 1:52 am

    @Bill_Toge ……nice marketing angle…..could sell this shampoo as a top-to-toe and do your dishes at the same time.

    I see you do hair products……we sell a lot of this shampoo to a hair salon in Singapore who claim it is one of the best they have come across. Will ask them if they have tried it on their dishes in the lunch room or cafe next door.

Log in to reply.

Chemists Corner