PhilGeis
Forum Replies Created
-
pH?
-
Does ACA charge for certification?
-
You can find info for small companies on the net - e.g. https://www.modernsoapmaking.com/blog/understanding-the-2022-united-states-cosmetic-regulation-changes-with-mocra
To your immediate question
small businesses are fully exempt from facility registration and product listing submission if their average gross annual sales for the previous 3-year period is less than $1,000,000 and do not make any of the following:
- cosmetics that come in contact with mucus membranes of the eye
- cosmetics that are injected
- cosmetics that are intended for internal use
- cosmetics that intend to alter the appearance for more than 24 hours
-
Washed, there is no issue
-
Very doubtful you’re not encountering NaOH per se.
-
Sorry - very doubtful that you ARE encountering….
-
-
No
-
what is your package?
-
As Perry said - this is unnecessary. I’ll add it’s BAD idea. Bacteria growing while you’re trying to “dry out”.
-
The difference is prob not significant, esp as you’re adding more via ECT.
-
How much will your formula accommodate?
-
how much?
-
What’s the preservative?
-
Thanks Mark.
Sure hope you guys make it fee for necessary services rather than the predatory piece of the action - ala a bunch we all know too well.
-
Is aloe the only source of water? Do you see this as oil in water or water in oil emulsion?
Preservation of the finished product is your responsibility - not your supplier’s.
If you determine no further preservation is needed, you’ll need to add the supplier’s preservative (system) top your ingredient label.’
-
There is no “sodium hydrochloric acid” and hydrochloric acid like NaOH is ionic so not the parent compound in water but the ions H and Cl. Not much use in cosmetics but perhaps to adjust pH and that at low levels.
Glycolic acid? This is not relevant to either of the above.
-
No. You should see it far down on the ingredient label and a little sodium will not be an issue.
Maybe the pH of the products bothers you. Look for that on SDS documents.
-
Right - they would not approach it without a wellthought out positioning/strategy. Need to see how FDA responds.
-
Think you’ll looking at the regulators more than the clinicians.
-
Wonder of just “100%” is enough
-
maybe they thought e-wax meant ear wax.
-
Has it passed challenge?
-
Good perspective. To OP’s question
More hexanediol. I don’t see it in the ingredient list - to that, please use chemical or INCI names. Maybe missed a commercial name.
For shampoos/surfactants - rinse-off products, chloromethyl isothiazolinone is more traditional esp with EDTA and benzoate*. Phenoxy/EHG/Benzoate/EDTA is prob pretty effective. Unless you’ve resources to qualify a diol, suggest you not chase it.
* not for fungi, they rarely cause issues in surfactant products, but as co-preservative, esp. to mitigate adaptation to the primary. Na benzoate serves this well and is effective beyond it’s pKa when combined with many surfactants (i.e. demonstrable efficacy up to pH neutrality).
-
You’ve CHA and piroctone is insoluble.
-
Piroctone is waste as a preservative.