

PhilGeis
Forum Replies Created
-
pH?
-
Sorbic acid is common to both of these poor preservastive systems and has stability issues. Experienced some “petroleum” odor - tho’ not with immediate issues on addition. Try something withoiut the stuff.
-
better get an IRB for that sandpaper clinical
-
Certainly chemcial and physical stabiluty assessment but no challenge testing. Do not see antimicrobial preservative as useful. Might look at similar large company products marketed.
-
I’ll just cut to the chase - if your water is just 1-2% in propylene glycol - you do not need a preservative. 86 the phenoxy/EHG.
-
You have a valid concern. Can you say more about the solvent and 1% water??
-
perhaps it needs a preservative.
-
PhilGeis
MemberJune 19, 2024 at 8:12 am in reply to: Preservation Q - Sodium Benzoate & Copper Distilled HydrosolsDo NOT trust your preservation to hydrosols - in whole or in part. If preservation is the only reason for their intended use - use is unreasonable.
These are not magic - they’re a mixture of unknown composition. To your question - you have no idea what’s in the stuff. From contaminants from production to pesticides from agriculture and most importantly the compounds putatively responsible for implied efficacy.
-
CMI/MI products need to be rinsed off.
-
Why 0.6% ethylhexyl glycerine? - You get it with Ashland’s PE 9010. Might increase 9010 a bit and add something for fungi and Gram + bacteria.
-
PhilGeis
MemberJune 14, 2024 at 7:48 am in reply to: Propylene glycol vs propanediol allergy/irritationAnecdotal reports may have confused irritation and sensitization. CIR reviews (RIPT and animal data) found neither to be a sensitizer.
https://cir-reports.cir-safety.org/view-attachment?id=3c317d65-8e74-ec11-8943-0022482f06a6
https://cir-reports.cir-safety.org/view-attachment?id=94742a1a-c561-614f-9f89-14ce58abfc0b
-
60C for any period (4 weeks!) is a pointless stability condition that simulates nothing but gross product abuse.
Why do you think it important?
-
Glycols have been used but can irritate
-
Even with a relevant pH, think benzoate alone is a risky preservative system.
-
PhilGeis
MemberJune 20, 2024 at 8:03 am in reply to: Preservation Q - Sodium Benzoate & Copper Distilled HydrosolsCoA should come from your supplier based on what is and what they can detect and control.
As to threshold for benzoate complexation, what is hydrosol % in product?
-
PhilGeis
MemberJune 19, 2024 at 6:50 pm in reply to: Preservation Q - Sodium Benzoate & Copper Distilled HydrosolsThanks for clarification. Kinda doubt would be enough copper to screw up your benzoate. Look for the blue complex and precipitate.
Can you get your supplier to put Cu on CoA?
-
I understand this stability slot is not your choice. Regret I have no solution for you other than its elimination.
-
PhilGeis
MemberJune 16, 2024 at 12:48 pm in reply to: Propylene glycol vs propanediol allergy/irritationI meant nothing and only repeated what the CIR found and concluded. The studies they cite were unable to provoke sensitization by HRIPT.
Are you sure the alleged reports (can your offer citation?) do not address irritation?
-
PhilGeis
MemberJune 15, 2024 at 4:35 am in reply to: Propylene glycol vs propanediol allergy/irritationSensitization aka allergic contact dermatitis.
-
Nope - don’t know. Is this the only condition you see this issue?
-
PhilGeis
MemberJune 12, 2024 at 3:40 am in reply to: Pentylene Glycol and Preservative 12 CompatabilityGood luck! Appreciate your concern for your customers safety.
-
PhilGeis
MemberJune 11, 2024 at 6:23 pm in reply to: Pentylene Glycol and Preservative 12 CompatabilityIf it goes into solution. Sorry for one more - did we talk about benzoate earlier too?
-
PhilGeis
MemberJune 11, 2024 at 10:19 am in reply to: Pentylene Glycol and Preservative 12 CompatabilityGluconic acid isn’t that great. If you hold Phenoxy/EHG to 0.80% or less would you consider 0.1% EDTA? You’d still be 99% natural.
-
PhilGeis
MemberJune 11, 2024 at 9:29 am in reply to: Pentylene Glycol and Preservative 12 CompatabilityThanks Olivia. Your understanding is not uncommon but is profoundly inadequate. I don’t see a preservative in the formula you describe just above. Please add a chelator AND a preservative
Please understand “cosmetic assessors” are junior bureaucrats with little knowledge of cosmetic microbiology. The concept is a product of even more ignorant regulators, the folks who brought us the total BS of PAO. Assume they’ve given thumbs up based on some version of challenge - ISO, USP, EP - tests that are not validated in any context. They do show baseline efficacy that, with clean RM’s and sanitary manufacturing, can get clean product out the door. However, The primary purpose of cosmetic preservation is protection in use.
A 6 month sell by date is absolutely meaningless. Even if compliance (how is that enforced?), the consumer will have the product for more months, even years through which preservative stability must be maintained. Major manufacturers who validated their preservatives to in use risk establish stability for 3 years.
Please add a chelator AND a preservative