-
Why 0.3% instead of 0.4% cationic guar for Sensorial attributes?
”To illustrate the improvement in combing force, Caucasian hair tresses were washed with a shampoo formulated with 16% w/w surfactants, either 14% SLES and 2% CAPB or 39% of the surfactant blend (16% active) and 0.4% guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride.<div>Sensorial attributes were tested with the same combinations of surfactants but with 0.3% guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride.”</div>
Source
Why would they use 0.4% cationic guar to show combing force reduction but 0.3% to show Sensorial attributes?
cosmeticsandtoiletries.com
Alternative Ingredients for Sustainable Shampoo Development
In this article, several ingredients are reviewed for the development of sustainable shampoo formulations. Some are plant-based alternatives to existing, petrochemically sourced ingredients. Others are mild, sulfate-free and/or ethoxylate-free alternatives; thickening solutions for naturally derived polymers; and efficacy boosters that … Continue reading
Sorry, there were no replies found.
Log in to reply.