Home Cosmetic Science Talk Formulating Vitamin E

  • Vitamin E

    Posted by Nyatou on December 23, 2022 at 5:09 pm

    Hi everybody, 

    So I’ve been formulating and I’m satisfied with the end results of my hair cream (o/w). 
    My only issue is that my target customers don’t have that much purchasing power therefore I am trying to reduce costs. Vitamin E is one of those ingredients I’d like to do something about cause it’s expensive. I am currently using 1%.  
    I have seen out there  tocopherol acetate which is cheaper,  but some formulators say it’s pointless so I have discarded it. 
    I wanna keep using tocopherol but I am not sure what quantity guarantees its antioxidant power. 
    I have been reading a lot and I am a bit confused. 
    It’s said that at 1% I have antioxidant effect and other skin-hair loving benefits. But if I wanted just the antioxidant property 0,1% of vitamin E 70%is enough in a O/W emulsion?
    In an anhydrous product shall I add a bit more like 0,5%? 

    Any insight is welcome
    Thanks in advance, 

    happy holidays

    Nyatou replied 1 year, 11 months ago 6 Members · 6 Replies
  • 6 Replies
  • SandalwoodBreeze

    Member
    December 24, 2022 at 7:54 am

    Vitamin E can be a pro-oxidant in larger amounts and less if often more. Combining a low dose of vitamin E with some Rosemary extract (that contains carnosic acid) would likely be better. You don’t really need much of E or rosemary to do a pretty good job. Natural seed oils contain about 15-30 mg/100g of vitamin E, and I usually aim for around that in my products.

  • chemicalmatt

    Member
    December 27, 2022 at 2:31 pm

    If the antioxidant property is indicated for unsaturated lipids in your formula, then 70% tocopherols should be pro-rated according to your lipid content roughly 0.10% for every 7.0% lipids, or use the rosemary oleoresin as @CedarWind108 suggests as long as you don’t mind that pinkish hue to the product. If you are adding this just as a direct “active” ingredient, just DELETE from the formula because it does jack-zero for hair.

  • MarkBroussard

    Member
    December 27, 2022 at 2:40 pm

    @chemicalmatt

    “Jack-Zero” … trademark that term!

  • PhilGeis

    Member
    December 27, 2022 at 3:27 pm

    Amen Mark!!

    @chemicalmatt
    OK if I use that?

  • Graillotion

    Member
    December 27, 2022 at 6:59 pm

    Jack Zero….and Beegan…Perry is going to have to add a tab…of CCF colloquialisms!  

    Love it.  I always wondered what was less than ZERO…and now I know.  Learn something new every day!

  • Nyatou

    Member
    December 28, 2022 at 8:17 pm

    Thank you all! ????

Log in to reply.

Chemists Corner