Home Cosmetic Science Talk Formulating Testing Ceramides vs Sphingolipids

  • Testing Ceramides vs Sphingolipids

    Posted by Thota on January 26, 2021 at 12:31 pm

    I am trying to make an elegant barrier supporting cream for dry acne prone skin. 
    And I have made few test emulsions

    Glycerin 2 %
    Xanthan 0.2% 
    Sodium lactate 2%
    PE 9010 1%
    Water QS

    Montanov L 1%
    Lotion Pro 1.5%
    CCTG 10%

    Now in the cool phase I added
    Sample 1 - 5% Squalane
    Sample 2 - 5% Ceramides by CLR (Aqua, Phospholipids, Sphingolipids)
    Sample 3 - 5% SK influx
    Sample 4 - 10% Ceramides by CLR (Aqua, Phospholipids, Sphingolipids)

    Sample 1 is pretty basic
    Sample 2 has nice enveloping effect
    Sample 3 is more fluid in consistency by more enveloping and light emollient occlusive effect 
    Sample 4 Almost similar emollincey to the sample with SK influx but a bit more sticky

    I definitely like the samples with ceramides - what I would call elegant emollience without heaviness

    Using SK influx makes the formula much more expensive than using Sphingolipids. 

    Any thoughts or inputs?

    Trying to understand the chemistry/ biology side of Ceramides vs Sphingolipids.

    Thanks in advance for your inputs!

    Thota replied 3 years, 10 months ago 3 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Pharma

    Member
    January 26, 2021 at 7:57 pm

    SK influx does, according to Evnok, not contain water whilst the Ceramides by CLR list water as first ingredient… you do the maths ;) .

  • jemolian

    Member
    January 27, 2021 at 1:14 am

    I’m wondering how effective the Ceramides by CLR would be.

    In terms of comparing the ingredients: 

    SK-Influx: 6% lipids

    • 1.5% Ceramide complex
      (Ceramides I, III, IIIB, VI) 
    • 0.5% Cholesterol 
    • 3.5% Free fatty acid 
    • 0.5% Phytosphingosine

    Ceramides by CLR: 2% lipids

    • Phospholipids
    • Sphingolipids (approx 0.2%) (The plant derived lipid mixture consists of at least 10 % sphingolipids (ceramides, glycoceramides = cerebrosides).)

    Seems that Sphingolipids from the Ceramides by CLR would include the whole group of lipids which will be unspecific, verse the specific blend of SK-Influx.

    I’m wondering where the free fatty acids came from though. 

  • Thota

    Member
    January 27, 2021 at 12:21 pm

    According to CLR data sheets  
    water > 50% 
    Phospholipids 1-5%
    Shingolipids 0.1-1% (I get quite frustrated if the range is this broad)

    SK Influx is almost 5 times the cost of Ceramides by CLR
    Sk influx seems to have 3 times the ceramides.

    Doing the math,

    10% of Ceramides by CLR is equivalent to 3.3% of Sk influx

    But cost wise 3.3% SK influx would cost me 30% more than 10% Ceramides by CLR. Thats a good comparison!

    But wanted to know function wise which one is better for acne prone skin?
    I really don’t know the complete science of ceramides,
    I know what their function in skin care,
    and they felt very elegant on skin. 

Log in to reply.

Chemists Corner