Home Cosmetic Science Talk Formulating General Science Oil and Water blended without surfactants

  • heraklit

    Member
    December 18, 2014 at 3:47 pm

    Now we are waiting for a new technology to replace also the preservatives…

  • belassi

    Member
    December 18, 2014 at 4:01 pm

    Yes, I suggested this a while back on the forum. I already began looking for parts, out of curiosity. Emulsions without emulsifiers. There’s a thought.

  • OldPerry

    Member
    December 18, 2014 at 4:54 pm

    @heraklit - that will be a much larger challenge.  Disease causing microbes have had over 300,000 years to evolve.  We’ve had about 150 years to figure out how to prevent them from killing us.

  • Liset

    Member
    December 19, 2014 at 8:40 am

    great!

    it is known that decreasing the size of the droplets or particles to the nano range one can create emulsions with low surfactant concentration (nanoemulsions). At laboratory scale one of the methods for producing nanoemulsions is ultrasound. Now they are able to apply that at industrial scale. I guess the droplet size is really tiny which guarantees the high stability. Amazing!

  • Bobzchemist

    Member
    December 19, 2014 at 10:14 am

    @heraklit - cosmetic preservatives have gotten a hugely bad reputation, largely because of junk science, fear-mongering, and invalid association with food preservatives. Their benefits far outweigh their risks. Aside from marketing claims, it would be an enormous waste of time, effort and money to replace all preservatives. (Which is not to say that people won’t try. Marketing advantage is a powerful thing.)

  • nasrins

    Member
    December 19, 2014 at 11:00 am

    @liset ultrasound makes very tiny droplets but what about its sound?? in industrial scale how should address it? its really harmful for ear

  • belassi

    Member
    December 19, 2014 at 11:18 am

    @nasrins: True. It is dangerous for hearing,

  • Liset

    Member
    December 19, 2014 at 11:24 am

    get out of there :-)

  • OldPerry

    Member
    December 19, 2014 at 12:20 pm

    @nasrins - I think it’s rather simple to shield people from the negative effects of ultrasonic production.

  • nasrins

    Member
    December 19, 2014 at 1:43 pm

    what do u mean?

  • David

    Member
    December 19, 2014 at 2:13 pm

    Liset did you make a nanoemulsion with ultrasound yourself? just curious.

  • Liset

    Member
    December 19, 2014 at 4:59 pm

    @David Yes, I was producing nanoparticles from a nanoemulsion.

  • OldPerry

    Member
    December 22, 2014 at 9:56 am

    @nasrins - earplugs.

  • Morgan

    Member
    January 31, 2015 at 11:22 am

    Ive made nano particles in the lab on a 2L scale. There is a slight ‘high frequency sound’ , and I can still hear ;-) . On the larger scale you would use similar equipment (that doesn’t ) produce too much sound, and similar scale to the lab. You achieve this by recirculating the fluid through the ultrasound device and back into the batch vessel. minimizing the size of the ultrasound device is a good thing (allows for scalability, doesn’t require sound proofing, limits the forces produced) . 

  • Morgan

    Member
    January 31, 2015 at 11:30 am

    the company we were working with was a uk company prosonix (they have a patented scale up technology).

Log in to reply.

Chemists Corner