Home › Cosmetic Science Talk › Formulating › Ingredients with the same INCI name aren’t necessarily the same
-
Ingredients with the same INCI name aren’t necessarily the same
Posted by OldPerry on January 10, 2018 at 10:19 pmOne of the things that many new formulators don’t realize is just because a raw material has a certain INCI name, doesn’t mean that another material with the same name is the same.
Here are a few reasons they might be different. Can you think of any other reasons?
https://chemistscorner.com/why-cosmetic-ingredients-with-the-same-name-arent-always-the-same
Why cosmetic ingredients with the same name aren’t always the same
Microformulation replied 6 years, 10 months ago 10 Members · 10 Replies -
10 Replies
-
LOL @glasses
Nice article. I think you could add a small paragraph about the certificate of analysis and the accepted ranges
-
in my experience the single ‘natural’ (i.e. refined rather than synthesised) material which has the widest range of variation is Petrolatum, and even then the specification only gives you part of the picture
from a sensorial point of view, a very important physical parameter is the cone penetration, which is a quantitative measure of how hard the material is, and a given manufacturer’s grades are usually differentiated on this basis
however the other, equally important key quantity is the elastic modulus, which generally isn’t measured, so in practise you have to evaluate different grades by physically comparing them side by side
the most widely variable fully synthetic material is Acrylates Copolymer, which is a generic term which covers anything from opacifiers to rheology modifiers to waterproofing agents
-
Particle size is another specification example that can play a big part in how the product performs for solid products. A very fine particle size for an exfoliant may be great for a face scrub but the exact same ingredient in a coarse particle size could do serious damage if used on the face.
I was looking through a supplier brochure this morning and there were about 8 different ingredients with the INCI of Magnesium Aluminium Silicate and these were all from the same company but had varying properties.
-
Great article Perry. Polymer weight/length has something to do with it, right? 5cst and 500cst Dimethicone will both show up as “Dimethicone” despite performing way different.
-
As a beginner formulater I noticed this but what shocked me the most is ”polyquatenium 10 high amine low viscosity ” and ”polyquatenium 10 low amine high viscosity ” by searching for the for the chemical structure of polyquatenium 10 I found one structure
-
Several years ago I reverse engineered a sunscreen for a client. The product used Dow Sunspheres (INCI: STYRENE/ACRYLATES COPOLYMER). It was an easy job and the product went straight to a Contract manufacturer. The Contract Manufacturer couldn’t get the Formulation correct. The client flew me to the plant and asked me to intervene and paid me for a full day. I walked into the lab and they had ordered a totally different DOW Product that had the same INCI but wasn’t an SPF booster. It was Accudyn Shine, an emulsion with the same INCI. I found the error within the first 5 minutes and spent the rest of the day networking and checking out their cGMP/SOP’s for the root client.
Log in to reply.