Home Cosmetic Science Talk Formulating How do we feel about Montanov 68?

  • How do we feel about Montanov 68?

    Posted by GeorgeBenson on January 7, 2023 at 10:17 am

    I have tried 202 and L, and I feel like I have a pretty good grasp on what to expect from them (They are my favorites as far as emulsifiers go). But i’ve never tried 68… is it worth getting? How does it compare to the other montanovs in terms of feel, stability, etc.?

    RobboAU replied 1 year, 11 months ago 4 Members · 5 Replies
  • 5 Replies
  • Squinny

    Member
    January 7, 2023 at 11:56 pm

    I have only used it once and make a face cream that a friend likes better than my other ones that I like - but I’m not a huge fan. You won’t know for yourself unless you buy some and test it. It’s easy to use though and you can make a product with just hand stirring. It does take a while (maybe a day) to get to it’s full thickness (in a cream) in my experience. Just buy a small amount and see. Cheers

  • Graillotion

    Member
    January 8, 2023 at 12:58 am

    I like the other two you mentioned better.  To me…68 feels more unctuous.  So if that is your goal….have at it.

  • Graillotion

    Member
    January 8, 2023 at 1:40 am

    Might just be the perfect emulsifier for an Exxon Valdez type night cream!  :D

  • GeorgeBenson

    Member
    January 8, 2023 at 3:22 am

    Actually an oil spill is exactly what i want for this particular formula im working on. A nice, controlled spill.

  • RobboAU

    Member
    January 9, 2023 at 12:23 am

    I like the other two you mentioned better.  To me…68 feels more unctuous.  So if that is your goal….have at it.

    Curious, I went the opposite way.

    I love 68 (technically the BASF equivalent) and found 202 unpleasant in comparison.

    I had to do a label copy of a popular hair styling product that used 68, but only had access to 202. I found the rub-in and spread of 202 was not as uniformly smooth and creamy, and was prone to beading and pilling. In contrast, I couldn’t stop playing with the 68 version - but it is “heavy”.

    68 is also cheaper than 202, so I reckon that’s worth trying  ;)

Log in to reply.

Chemists Corner