Home › Cosmetic Science Talk › Formulating › How CTAC contribute to the viscosity?
-
How CTAC contribute to the viscosity?
Posted by ZivBA on August 16, 2018 at 5:56 amHello,
I have a formula for hair cream according to the following raw materials:
Phase 1, Heating to 70:
- Water- 80%
- Polyquaternium7- 2%
Phase 2, Heating to 70:
- Mineral Oil- 5%
- Cetyl Alcohol- 4%
- GMS SE- 2%
- Dimethicone 350cp- 1%
- Vaseline- 1%
Homogenize and stirring.
Then the liquid product is liquid at 50-60 temp,
But immediately with the addition of CTAC-4%, the substance becomes a viscous cream.why?
DAS replied 6 years, 6 months ago 5 Members · 11 Replies -
11 Replies
-
It is most likely that the CTAC (cationic) is incompatible with the anionic potassium stearate that is present in the GMS SE.
-
Usually CETAC reduces viscosity
But you can try mixing some bare K-stearate with CETAC to see if they form a thick slime = sign of uncompatibility. -
Also, this effect would likely be pH dependent, where it would be less significant below the pKa of the potassium stearate (i.e., where it becomes neutral).
-
Thank you for the comments,
I want to say that this change to thick cream is welcome! I want and need this change, I just still don’t understand how and why it is happening, and what I should do if I want to duplicate it to another formula
you all say that the small amount of K-Stearate that is present in the GMS SE is responsible for this change?
-
It’s how an ewax is made. Cetyl + surfactant, in this case the CTAC.
-
Self emulsifying waxes are a blend of a fatty alcohol and a surfactant. The result is usually a solid, for example BTMS is an ewax. It becomes pasty even at low percentage. Considering you are using 4% of each the result will be creamy on cool down. The reticulate formed by the cetyl alcohol + CTAC is what holds the rest of the ingredients. You do have an important quantity of oils, the GMS SE wouldn’t hold by itself.
-
First stage. Better homogenization with less torque, and to prevent air bubbles.
-
It IS an emulsion. Think of you hair conditioners, what would happen if you remove the surfactant?.
You would have to ask croda, perhaps if you mail R&D they answer. They do perform differently, those 2 carbons make a huge difference. Cetearyl is used to avoid recrystallization (being 16 and 18 they don’t align the same). Perhaps the microstructure with BTMS shows no significant difference.
Log in to reply.