Home Cosmetic Science Talk Formulating Is Caprylic Capric Triglycerides not compatible with iso propyl myristate?

  • Is Caprylic Capric Triglycerides not compatible with iso propyl myristate?

    Posted by Shubh123 on March 17, 2017 at 10:05 am

    Is Caprylic Capric Triglycerides not compatible with iso propyl myristate?

    Shubh123 replied 7 years, 5 months ago 5 Members · 37 Replies
  • 37 Replies
  • johnb

    Member
    March 17, 2017 at 10:23 am

    In what way do you mean - physically or chemically?

    There is no chemical incompatibility and as for physical compatibility, test that for yourself by mixing the two materials together

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 17, 2017 at 10:27 am

    @johnb
    I made a cream with IPM it has becom good but when i had made a cream with combination of cctg and ipm it has separated

  • johnb

    Member
    March 17, 2017 at 10:35 am

    I doubt it’s incompatibility between those two materials but a problem with the formula you are using.

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 17, 2017 at 10:39 am

    @johnb
    Oil Phase contain Stearic acid, Cetyl alcohol, IPM, CCTG, GMS, Kojic dipalmitate & LLP

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 17, 2017 at 10:41 am

    HLB value required for CCTG is 5 and for IPM is 11.5.Is there any problem?

  • johnb

    Member
    March 17, 2017 at 11:27 am

    And the emulsifier is?

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 17, 2017 at 11:38 am

    @johnb
    Emulsifier is Polyacrylamide & C13-14 Isoparaffin & Laureth-7. 

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 17, 2017 at 11:38 am

    It is cold preocess emulsifier so we added it in last stage.

  • johnb

    Member
    March 17, 2017 at 11:57 am

    I am not familiar with Sepigel 305 but, from what I have read, it is best mixed with the oil phase when forming the emulsion.

  • Bill_Toge

    Member
    March 17, 2017 at 2:11 pm

    @Shubh123 the HLB value you’ve quoted for caprylic/capric triglycerides is for a W/O emulsion - the figure for O/W is closer to 12

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 20, 2017 at 4:14 am

    @johnb
    ok. I will mix it in oil Phase.

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 20, 2017 at 4:15 am

    @Bill_Toge
    Thnx! I am prepairing o/w emulsion based cream

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 24, 2017 at 5:54 am

    @Bill_Toge
    Still getting problem.
    Firstly the emulsion is prepapred after few mintues it breaks. Water is separated.
    Water Phase is
    Water
    Microcrystalline Cellulose and xanthum gum-1%
    Glycerine-2%
    EDTA-0.1%
    Oil Phase is
    LLP-3%
    IPM-5
    KAD-4
    SILISILY-2
    CETYL ALCOHOL-1.5
    stearic acid-3
    Gms-3
    coated TiO2-1

  • Chemist77

    Member
    March 24, 2017 at 6:22 am

    I don’t get what is Silysily, secondly why the coated pigment here. Third I still feel an acute need of a proper emulsifier here, have you read the compatibility and incompatibility of KAD with your formula ingredients. 

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 24, 2017 at 7:01 am

    @Chemist77
    Sorry, Silysily is Hydrogenated Polyisobutane. I enter trade name by mistake.. Coated pigment for whitening. I remove KAD but still the emulsion is breaking. What u suggest?What should i do?

  • Bill_Toge

    Member
    March 24, 2017 at 7:51 am

    the fact there’s no high HLB emulsifier will be a major contributor to instability; try adding ceteareth-20 or an anionic emulsifier

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 24, 2017 at 8:07 am

    @Bill_Toge
    I am using anionic cold process emulsifier Polyacrylamide & C13-1Isoparaffin & Laureth. i am adding it in last stage. I tried this emulsifier in oil phase but still not satisfied.

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 24, 2017 at 8:09 am

    @Bill_Toge
    I reach at new stage that after breaking emulsion if i mixed it for 45min. it again form a good emulsion. How is it possible?

  • johnb

    Member
    March 24, 2017 at 8:09 am

    You mentioned Polyacrylamide & C13-14 Isoparaffin & Laureth-7 earlier. This does not appear in your later postings.

    As Bill points out, there is no emulsifier present. The Polyacrylamide & C13-14 Isoparaffin & Laureth-7 is not an effective emulsifier alone - even it is actually present. It is described by the manufacturer as “Sepigel 305 is a thickening, stabilizing, liquid, ready-to-use polymer.”

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 24, 2017 at 8:12 am

    @johnb
    sorry Si! I forgot to mention. i tried Polyacrylamide & C13-1Isoparaffin & Laureth-7 in oil phase as u say but still getting same result. But now i mixed that emulsion for 45min again the emulsion is formed

  • johnb

    Member
    March 24, 2017 at 8:15 am

    You seem to be ignoring the absence of an emulsifier.

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 24, 2017 at 9:05 am

    @johnb
    Which emulsifier should i use?

  • johnb

    Member
    March 24, 2017 at 9:34 am

    It is rather late in the progression of this saga to be asking which emulsifier should be used. That ought have been one of the priorities when you first began thinking about the product.

    I can’t really give any recommendations about a choice of emulsifier as I don’t know enough about your aims or about what is available to you. Also, I would not have produced a formulation like the one you are querying so it is “out of my comfort zone”.

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 24, 2017 at 10:02 am

    @johnb
    OK Sir! 

  • Shubh123

    Member
    March 24, 2017 at 10:41 am

    The problem is with microcrystalline cellulose and xanthum gum. 

Page 1 of 2

Log in to reply.

Chemists Corner