-
Formula Advice: Gentle Shampoo + Body Wash
Hello,
I am new to this forum and seeking advice on a formula I have recently made. It is supposed to be a gentle shampoo and body wash which I am hoping to make usable by children two years and older. I do not intend on selling this product, but instead giving them away as gifts to friends and family. I want to clarify that I am absolutely a beginner at formulating and trying to learn more every day.
Formula:
- Distilled Water: 67%
- Decyl Glucoside: 10%
- Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate:5%
- Shea Butteramidopropyl Betaine: 5%
- PEG-40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil: 5%
- Hydrolyzed Rice Protein: 5%
- Tocopherol (Vitamin E Oil): 2%
- Preservative (Benzyl Alcohol, Salicylic Acid, Glycerin, and Sorbic Acid): 1%
This resulted in a cleanser that produced a nice amount of foam and left my skin feeling clean but not stripped. I have a few concerns, though:
- Is the Vitamin E oil worth adding to a rinse-off product? I found some research that believes it might have some effectiveness in this application, but I was hoping to hear your opinions. I know oil is generally useless in a cleanser.
- In this version of the formula, the Vitamin E oil separated onto the top layer of the product. I thought the combination of SCI and HCO would take care of that, but it seems I was wrong, or maybe didn’t use enough. I made another version where I subbed 3% of the water weight for BTMS-25 and it has not separated yet, but I am not sure if that is the right choice because I am not using cationic surfactants.
- Is the salicylic acid content of the preservative unsafe for children’s skin? If so, can an alternative preservative be suggested?
- Is Decyl Glucoside a bad choice for a surfactant? I ordered it before learning that it has been linked to contact dermatitis and I have seen some distaste for it in this forum, but it is still used by brands like Johnson & Johnson and Pipette Baby, which is why I originally thought it was a safe choice.
If anyone has additional suggestions or comments they would like to make, I would really appreciate it. This formula might be a total mess, but I am still learning and trying to start with something simple.
-
33 Replies
-
I would say remove decyl Glucoside or reduce it to 1%
Remove PEG, protein and vitamin e
Add 0.2% EDTA
Suggest DMDM hydantoin or phenoxyethanol with sodium benzoate as preservative.
I don’t like benzyl alcohol.
-
Abdullah said:I would say remove decyl Glucoside or reduce it to 1%Remove PEG, protein and vitamin e
Add 0.2% EDTA
Suggest DMDM hydantoin or phenoxyethanol with sodium benzoate as preservative.
I don’t like benzyl alcohol.
Thank you for replying.
Would there be any reason to keep Decyl Glucoside at 1% vs. eliminating it from the formula? Should I replace it with a different surfactant?
Also, any reason why you suggest removing the protein? I read from the supplier that it was especially great for hair, but maybe I just fell for the marketing.
I will look into those preservatives. I appreciate your help.
-
Thank you for replying.
Would there be any reason to keep Decyl Glucoside at 1% vs. eliminating it from the formula? Should I replace it with a different surfactant?
Because decyl Glucoside is not a good surfactant.Use some SLES.
Also, any reason why you suggest removing the protein? I read from the supplier that it was especially great for hair, but maybe I just fell for the marketing.
it doesn’t have much benefit in shampoo.
If it is beneficial, apply it to your hair after shampoo.
I would suggest if you use a premade blend of surfactant. That would work better.I will look into those preservatives. I appreciate your help.
-
Abdullah said:Thank you for replying.
Would there be any reason to keep Decyl Glucoside at 1% vs. eliminating it from the formula? Should I replace it with a different surfactant?
Because decyl Glucoside is not a good surfactant.Use some SLES.
Also, any reason why you suggest removing the protein? I read from the supplier that it was especially great for hair, but maybe I just fell for the marketing.
it doesn’t have much benefit in shampoo.
If it is beneficial, apply it to your hair after shampoo.
I would suggest if you use a premade blend of surfactant. That would work better.I will look into those preservatives. I appreciate your help.
Thanks again!
I don’t currently have SLES, although I could try to purchase it. Do you think SCI and Shea Butteramidopropyl Betaine would be good enough?
I’ll take your advice on removing the protein, PEG and Vitamin E as well.
As for the preservative, I have a blend of Phenoxyethanol and Ethylhexylglycerin readily available. Is that a safe choice for this product?
-
Camel said:Abdullah said:Thank you for replying.
Would there be any reason to keep Decyl Glucoside at 1% vs. eliminating it from the formula? Should I replace it with a different surfactant?
Because decyl Glucoside is not a good surfactant.Use some SLES.
Also, any reason why you suggest removing the protein? I read from the supplier that it was especially great for hair, but maybe I just fell for the marketing.
it doesn’t have much benefit in shampoo.
If it is beneficial, apply it to your hair after shampoo.
I would suggest if you use a premade blend of surfactant. That would work better.I will look into those preservatives. I appreciate your help.
Thanks again!
I don’t currently have SLES, although I could try to purchase it. Do you think SCI and Shea Butteramidopropyl Betaine would be good enough?
i did purchase some sci but didn’t work with it. They say it is hard to dissolve.
use CAPB. I have use shea betaine.
I’ll take your advice on removing the protein, PEG and Vitamin E as well.As for the preservative, I have a blend of Phenoxyethanol and Ethylhexylglycerin readily available. Is that a safe choice for this product?
yes. Good for shampoo. Although it will reduce the viscosity. -
@Camel If you’ll use this product in children 2y+, I’d advise you to follow something similar as what J&J does for their baby/kids products. They constantly conduct efficacy and safety tests, so that would be a good formulation model (especially if “no tears” is something desirable, where the use of PEG-80 sorbitan laurate, sulfosuccinates and sultaines can be beneficial).
Proteins can actually help in reducing irritation from anionic surfactants by forming complexes with them; the challenge being the microbiological issue with proteins, so it’s worthy to try them only if you can spend some money on microbiological testing.
-
Abdullah said:Camel said:Abdullah said:Thank you for replying.
Would there be any reason to keep Decyl Glucoside at 1% vs. eliminating it from the formula? Should I replace it with a different surfactant?
Because decyl Glucoside is not a good surfactant.Use some SLES.
Also, any reason why you suggest removing the protein? I read from the supplier that it was especially great for hair, but maybe I just fell for the marketing.
it doesn’t have much benefit in shampoo.
If it is beneficial, apply it to your hair after shampoo.
I would suggest if you use a premade blend of surfactant. That would work better.I will look into those preservatives. I appreciate your help.
Thanks again!
I don’t currently have SLES, although I could try to purchase it. Do you think SCI and Shea Butteramidopropyl Betaine would be good enough?
i did purchase some sci but didn’t work with it. They say it is hard to dissolve.
use CAPB. I have use shea betaine.
I’ll take your advice on removing the protein, PEG and Vitamin E as well.As for the preservative, I have a blend of Phenoxyethanol and Ethylhexylglycerin readily available. Is that a safe choice for this product?
yes. Good for shampoo. Although it will reduce the viscosity.What I do to dissolve SCI is first mix it with the Shea Betaine to form a paste, and then dissolve the paste in heated water phase. Haven’t had any problems doing it like that yet!
Thanks for all of your advice.
-
ketchito said:@Camel If you’ll use this product in children 2y+, I’d advise you to follow something similar as what J&J does for their baby/kids products. They constantly conduct efficacy and safety tests, so that would be a good formulation model (especially if “no tears” is something desirable, where the use of PEG-80 sorbitan laurate, sulfosuccinates and sultaines can be beneficial).
Proteins can actually help in reducing irritation from anionic surfactants by forming complexes with them; the challenge being the microbiological issue with proteins, so it’s worthy to try them only if you can spend some money on microbiological testing.
I would love to conduct efficacy and safety tests, although I am not sure I would be able to do that on my own. I only make these products as gifts for friends and family, and I’ve never made one for babies before, but I wanted to make something for my two year old godson. Would you advise against this if I can’t conduct proper testing?
As for the protein, I’m not sure I completely understand what you mean, sorry. Are you saying it is harder to preserve them? The label on my protein says it is already preserved with Leucidal liquid. Would it still be a problem to use it without microbiological testing?
-
Can’t use sal acid on kids under 3 per EU cosm. directive.
If you use an organic acid, make is benzoic (as Na salt).
I’d put phenoxyethanol behind isothiazolinones and DMM hydantoin.
Add a chelant - esp. EDTA. -
PhilGeis said:Can’t use sal acid on kids under 3 per EU cosm. directive.
If you use an organic acid, make is benzoic (as Na salt).
I’d put phenoxyethanol behind isothiazolinones and DMM hydantoin.
Add a chelant - esp. EDTA.Thank you; I definitely won’t use the preservative with sal acid for this product. For the chelant, I have Sodium Gluconate on hand, would that be a suitable alternative at 1%? I see it being used by Pipette Baby products as well, which gives me some hope.
-
Gluconate is not a good substitute for EDTA.
-
Looking back at this discussion, I am quite embarrassed by how ridiculous this formula was. I have learned a lot since joining this forum and have now made a new shampoo formula:
Active Matter: 10%
pH: adjusted to 4.5- Water: up to 100%
- Shea Butteramidopropyl Betaine: 8%
- Sodium Coco-Sulfate: 4%
- Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate: 4%
- Polyquaternium-10: 0.5%
- Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose: 0.5%
- Sodium Phytate: 0.5%
- Phenonip: 0.5%
- Citric Acid: q.s.
@Abdullah, @ketchito, @PhilGeis - Any thoughts on this new one?
-
@Camel I’m no expert but it looks pretty good to me. Do you need that much sodium phytate? Genuinely asking as I usually only use 0.1%.
Are you getting your shea surfactant from Simply Ingredients? I just received my first order of it from them and I find that it doesn’t foam very much but it leaves my skin feeling pretty soft…not as soft SCI does though. It’s pretty expensive too, no? They seem to be the only ones selling it…that I could find any way…maybe that’s why.
-
GeorgeBenson said:@Camel I’m no expert but it looks pretty good to me. Do you need that much sodium phytate? Genuinely asking as I usually only use 0.1%.
Are you getting your shea surfactant from Simply Ingredients? I just received my first order of it from them and I find that it doesn’t foam very much but it leaves my skin feeling pretty soft…not as soft SCI does though. It’s pretty expensive too, no? They seem to be the only ones selling it…that I could find any way…maybe that’s why.
That was one of the questions I wanted to ask but forgot to. I honestly wasn’t sure how much sodium phytate is needed to be an effective chelating agent. My seller says 0.5% max so I just went with that. ????
Yes, that is where I purchase my Shea Surfactant and SCI. I love her shop and she (Valerie) has been been really kind to me in offering formulation advice so I don’t mind paying a little extra to support her. I don’t sell these products so cost isn’t much of a concern for me!
Shea Surfactant does not provide much foam but I find the combination with SCS + SCI offers plenty of foam. I may consider increasing SCS to 6% and reducing SCI to 2% while keeping the active matter around 10%, just to see how that compares foam-wise.
Thank you for your comment!
-
I would reduce pq10, HPMC and and sodium phytate to 0.1% each.
use EDTA instead of sodium phytate and CAPB instead of shea betaine.pH 6
What is the active percentage of each surfactant? -
Abdullah said:I would reduce pq10, HPMC and and sodium phytate to 0.1% each.
use EDTA instead of sodium phytate and CAPB instead of shea betaine.What is the active percentage of each surfactant?Unfortunately, the picture didn’t show up properly, but the active percentages are:
- Shea Surfactant: 35% active
- Sodium Coco-Sulfate: 95% active
- Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate: 85% active
Total Active Matter is about 10% in my formula.
I can definitely try reducing PQ-10 and sodium phytate, but I’m afraid the viscosity will drop significantly without the HPMC at 0.5%. It’s already a low-viscosity, runny gel. I will try that and see what happens.
I still have 1kg left of Shea Betaine, which is a lot for me since I make small batches for personal use. I will consider trying out CAPB after I finish it. ????
Is sodium phytate less effective than EDTA?
Thank you for your suggestions!
-
Use sodium chloride.
When finished these ingredients
Use SLES instead of coco sulfate
Use cationic guar instead of pq10
It is about equal but much more expensive without any benefit in shampoo.
-
Abdullah said:pH 6
Can I ask why you suggest pH 6? Is it because of the SCI?
I spoke with Valerie (she is the seller of my SCI and also a cosmetic chemist) and she advised there is no problem with using SCI at pH 4-5. ????
Abdullah said:Use sodium chloride.When finished these ingredients
Use SLES instead of coco sulfate
Use cationic guar instead of pq10
It is about equal but much more expensive without any benefit in shampoo.
I will try the sodium chloride to thicken it. I purchased SCS because it was actually cheaper than SLES and I thought it would perform similarly. ????
-
Yes because of sci.
I am not sure about its stability, internet and suppliers say different things.
Maybe @Perry or another expert comment what is correct.
-
I use SCI in a shampoo with a ph of 5 and it’s completely fine.
-
What percentage of sci and total Surfactants do you use?
It is said that it loses its activity over time at pH below 6
-
@Perry, I would love to hear your thoughts about this.
-
I use 5% SCI. Total formula has 31% surfactants including the SCI. Don’t ask me what the solids % is that I do not know.
I would also like to know what @Perry or any one else thinks about this. I did not know about its potential to lose activity over time.
-
GeorgeBenson said:I use 5% SCI. Total formula has 31% surfactants including the SCI. Don’t ask me what the solids % is that I do not know.
I would also like to know what @Perry or any one else thinks about this. I did not know about its potential to lose activity over time.
You can check with your seller; it is important information to know. I think most SCI’s have an active matter around 80-85%.
-
Camel said:Abdullah said:I would reduce pq10, HPMC and and sodium phytate to 0.1% each.
use EDTA instead of sodium phytate and CAPB instead of shea betaine.What is the active percentage of each surfactant?Unfortunately, the picture didn’t show up properly, but the active percentages are:
- Shea Surfactant: 35% active
- Sodium Coco-Sulfate: 95% active
- Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate: 85% active
Total Active Matter is about 10% in my formula.
I can definitely try reducing PQ-10 and sodium phytate, but I’m afraid the viscosity will drop significantly without the HPMC at 0.5%. It’s already a low-viscosity, runny gel. I will try that and see what happens.
I still have 1kg left of Shea Betaine, which is a lot for me since I make small batches for personal use. I will consider trying out CAPB after I finish it. ????
Is sodium phytate less effective than EDTA?
Thank you for your suggestions!
I’d replace coco sulfate (it’s very similar to lauryl sulfate). Try a more ethoxylated surfactant, like sodium laureth-3 sulfate (or higher).
Log in to reply.