Home Cosmetic Science Talk Formulating General This explains a few people…

  • MichelleReece

    Member
    April 8, 2015 at 10:50 pm

    That’s been the underlying message in that website and its sister website, sciencebasedmedicine.org, both of which I’ve been following for years.

    The limitations of Google-ing are relevant here:

    1. Past search history and keywords can skew search results. Many people don’t go beyond 2-3 pages, so of course they could easily pay attention to the bad information. If you want the studies, search on Google Scholar.

    2. Not all medical journals are high quality, and in fact there are several bad ones. But not even the best medical papers are immune from publishing sub-par or bad studies.

    3. You should look around for any methodological criticisms (from the experts) or recent paper retractions. Keep an eye on Pubpeer and retractionwatch.com.

    4. You should really know how to read a study. Having a background in statistics will help a lot.

    5. Some companies and researchers like to abuse/skew double blinded, placebo-controlled studies because they know it’s immediately credible. One example: check the treatment vs placebo. If they are in different vehicles-say, a cream versus a gel-it’s not double blinded.

  • billichemist

    Member
    April 9, 2015 at 2:45 am

    this is a great article

  • ozgirl

    Member
    April 9, 2015 at 4:08 am

    Thanks for sharing! A very interesting article.

  • OldPerry

    Member
    April 9, 2015 at 1:17 pm

    Great points @MichelleReece

  • heraklit

    Member
    April 9, 2015 at 5:18 pm

    I tried 3 different browsers and can’t open the link.

  • Bobzchemist

    Member
    April 9, 2015 at 6:19 pm
  • heraklit

    Member
    April 9, 2015 at 8:29 pm

    O.k. great article!

Log in to reply.

Chemists Corner