Home Cosmetic Science Talk Formulating The necessity of buffering Geogard Ultra

  • The necessity of buffering Geogard Ultra

    Posted by Springwaves on April 10, 2024 at 9:11 pm

    Hi, I’m a formulation newbie. I am wondering if it’s really necessary to buffer Geogard ultra considering end product pH is at 5.5, so if the pH drift downward, there would be enough room to still be in a skin friendly pH range right? (considering other ingredients are compatible with pH range 4-6)

    On another note, if I need to buffer Geogard Ultra, can I buffer it in the pure water phase(let’s say I’m making a lotion), then re-adjust again after product is finished? Will heat affect the buffered solution?

    Thank you!

    Springwaves replied 2 weeks, 4 days ago 3 Members · 16 Replies
  • 16 Replies
  • Graillotion

    Member
    April 10, 2024 at 9:47 pm

    I guess I’d be far more concerned with how will you preserve the product…vs messing around with drifting pH from Geogard U.

    How do you propose to pick up Gram negatives?

    Use a proper chelate…and a proper preservative….issue solved. 🙂

    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 6 days ago by  Graillotion.
    • Springwaves

      Member
      April 10, 2024 at 11:01 pm

      Thank you for the reply, for the full preservative system I use 1% Geogard Ultra, 0.2% Potassium sorbate, and 0.1% Sodium Gluconate. This should be enough?

      • PhilGeis

        Member
        April 11, 2024 at 6:27 am

        Prob not enough. At right pH, sorbate may not be needed but drop the gluconate.

        As graillotion said - you need something for Gram negative bacteria - your greatest risk. Perhaps try phenoxyethanol.

        • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 6 days ago by  PhilGeis.
        • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 6 days ago by  PhilGeis.
        • Springwaves

          Member
          April 11, 2024 at 8:30 am

          Thank you for the suggestion, I checked my supplier, I am able to get Phenoxyethanol + Caprylyl Glycol or Phenoxyethanol & Ethylhexylglycerin. Which one do you recommend?

          • Graillotion

            Member
            April 11, 2024 at 5:34 pm

            Go with the EHG combo. Tends to be slightly less disruptive to the emulsion than the CG version.

            • Springwaves

              Member
              April 12, 2024 at 9:38 am

              thank you, noted 🙂

        • Springwaves

          Member
          April 11, 2024 at 8:34 am

          btw, what’s your reason for dropping gluconate? If I use a strong preservative like phenoxyethanol, I don’t need a chelating agent?

          • PhilGeis

            Member
            April 11, 2024 at 9:24 am

            Gluconate is a poor chelator, and you have gluconolactone that hydrolyzes to gluconic acid/gluconate. For a chealtor use EDTA, GLDA, phytic acid, etc..

          • Graillotion

            Member
            April 11, 2024 at 5:36 pm

            You need the chelate….just a good one.

            EDTA is of course king…but sometimes the granola folk don’t like it cus of biodegradable rate. Hence GLDA is your next best choice.

  • Springwaves

    Member
    April 10, 2024 at 11:04 pm

    I guess i’m on the “Natural” preservative hype train, I would prefer to use COSMOS or ecocert approved preservatives that are odorless. I know a lot of the Natural preservatives are not actually natural, but when I plan to market the product, at least I can say it’s COSMOS approved to be used in natural skincare.

    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 6 days ago by  Springwaves.
    • Graillotion

      Member
      April 11, 2024 at 5:41 pm

      I would say… NO preservatives are natural. Find me ONE…that is not synthesized in a lab. The ones that are sold to the gullible as natural….simply paid a bribe…to have their lab synthesized chemical….certified as ‘natural’. 😂

      You probably won’t find too many on this site…that will sing “Kum ba yah” with you for all those agencies with their hand out….and with ZERO focus on safety. This group tends to tick with what is safe (you know….science) …not what some group (often lacking knowledge or common sense) chose as their ethos.

      • Springwaves

        Member
        April 12, 2024 at 9:45 am

        I agree with you on that one, safety first.

Log in to reply.