Hello! I am getting a niacinamide serum formulated and I want 10% niacinamide in it while manufacturer says "We don't suggest to add niacinamide to 10% because what we use for raw material is pure and high-concentrated, it need to dilute before adding into serum. So 5% is the most."
How true is that?
Moreover, what's best alternative to zinc PCA 1%?
Thank you!
Comments
The Ordinary has 10% B3, but again, why? I think 5% should be the top.
Second remember - More does not need better. Some actives work at super low concentrations.
Best alternative to Zinc PCA? ... Sodium PCA
Best alternative for zinc PCA?.... Assuming this is a cost issue? A genius once whispered to me that answer... blend zinc sulfate (super cheap) with sodium PCA....and what do you have?
Does it also need specific temperature, mixing speed other requirements or by just mixing them this reaction happens?
Sodium PCA - Highest performing of all humectants; high end cosmeceutical products (expensive); synergistic effect with sodium hyaluronate.
I will try to google it also, just to check it out. Might be interesting aye?
See website for details www.desertinbloomcosmeticslab.com
See website for details www.desertinbloomcosmeticslab.com
But also believe Na PCA is great. And not feeling tacky when used in higher percentages.
Ooops! ... My comment did not post. To answer your question:
"So will there be any effect that zinc PCA or sodium PCA has?"
Let's assume you mix 50/50 Zn Sulfate and Na PCA ... Yes, but why not just use 1/2 the amount of ZnPCA and not have to combine two separate ingredients when you don't get to list ZnPCA on your ingredient list?
See website for details www.desertinbloomcosmeticslab.com
1. An expert here told me that if we combine same ratio of fatty acids+glycerin as a plant oil like coconut oil, it will not function as coconut oil. Also if you apply coconut oil to skin, the glycerin in it will not function as glycerin although it has ~10% glycerin. So how these ions when separated function the same as it was combined?
2. Is it the zinc PCA or zinc sulfate form that is doing the function for which they are being used or just the zinc part?
3. As i don't have chemistry background, can you tell me why mixing zinc sulfate with sodium PCA turns to Zn, Na, Sulfate and PCA ions dissociated in the aqueous phase and not stay there original form?
@Rimshah most extracts have very little antioxidant capacity (with few exceptions)...keep in mind that they have usually metal (ions) traces, which act as catalyst of oxidative properties, so you'd need a more robust antioxidant to protect them.
https://www.sephora.com/product/the-ordinary-deciem-niacinamide-10-zinc-1-P427417
Yea, the (Sulfate) monohydrate is like 'wet' zinc sulfate. I'd go with that one.
If you want zinc in its free form (which is the one active against microbes), zinc sulfate is the way to go. Also, it's an INCI ingredient (not sure whether or not the other forms are).
Zinc oxide is a different horse, don't go with that one.
Zinc gluconate and citrate are weakly chelated... they may be okay for oral supplementation but come with a lower overall zinc content (large chelate molecules) and poor skin permeation. From what I can see, no benefit in cosmetics.
Zinc aspartate and glycinate are amino acid complexes, similar to zinc PCA. However, many commercial amino acid complexes are actually a blend of the amino acid with sulfate salts... depends on the supplier. Bulk supplements isn't always too straightforward with the exact composition... If you want zinc in your skin instead of on your skin, zinc glycinate would be a good choice and has a higher % of zinc than other organic salts/complexes (zinc aspartate isn't soluble, forget that one). Zinc picolinate is close to zinc PCA and probably the most stable complex (also most pH tolerant) though I'm not sure what higher amounts of picolinic acid would do to skin (picolinates are great for gastrointestinal absorption and likely show good skin penetration too).
Zinc orotate... too poor solubility, too low amount of overall zinc, and too pricey. I really don't see any advantage of that one.
Hence, on the skin: zinc sulfate (quite heavily counts as electrolyte), in the skin: zinc glycinate (unless zinc picolinate is an INCI ingredient, both don't count as electrolytes).
Aloha.
See website for details www.desertinbloomcosmeticslab.com
How do you compare it to zinc gluconate?
Somethings just aren't meant to be applied...
Moreover, zinc PCA and sodium hyaluronate can be used together without compromising the efficiency of zinc PCA?
"The water-binding capacity of the sodium salts of lactic acid and PCA are higher than that of glycerin. Treatment of guinea pig footpad corneum with humectant solutions shows that the water held by corneum decreases in the following order: Sodium PCA>sodium lactate>glycerine>sorbitol"
Ref: Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology edited by Barel, Paye, Maibach
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307863658_SKIN_CARE_FORMULATION_INCORPORATING_SODIUM_LACTATES_SODIUM_PCA_AND_LAURYL_PCA_COMPARATIVE_MOISTURISING_EFFICACY_ON_ASIAN_SKIN_SKIN_CARE_FORMULATION_INCORPORATING_SODIUM_LACTATES_SODIUM_PCA_AND_LAURYL_
From what I remember, glycerin has the lowest molecular weight and the moisturizing effect may persist after washing.
@grapefruit22 - The problem with the study you posted is that it doesn't demonstrate Sodium Lactate and Sodium PCA are better. What is shows is that if you take a formula that includes 3% glycerin and then you add additional Sodium Lactate or Sodium PCA, then you get better scores using a corneometer. One has to wonder, why didn't they do the additional test where they just increased the level of Glycerin and see how much additional scoring they would have gotten.
The cosmetic industry is awash is badly designed studies on all kinds of technology. And that is primarily because the studies are done by or funded by motivated researchers. There is no benefit to anyone in verifying that Glycerin is the best humectant for a skin care product. It's cheap. It's effective. There is no financial benefit to showing Petrolatum gives anti-wrinkling effects as good or better than active ingredients like ceramides or vitamins or any other ingredient of the day. So, this is why I'm highly skeptical of most any "research" that conflicts with what has been accepted fact in the cosmetic industry for decades. I'm not closed minded, but the studies better be robust.