Here are my thoughts on the subject of stem cells in cosmetics. Basically, I think they are promising but the technology at the moment is simply a claims ingredient with little to no benefit.
I'm also highly skeptical that people will see any real effects from topically applied growth factors. These may show promise in cell cultures in the lab but this has not translated into actual topically applied products.
Some derms are better trained than others and while their advice about skin diseases and conditions is reliable, I'd have much less faith in their advice about daily skin care maintenance. They are easily misinformed & some are motivated to get you to buy into a marketing story so you buy products from them.
Here are my thoughts on the subject of stem cells in cosmetics. Basically, I think they are promising but the technology at the moment is simply a claims ingredient with little to no benefit.
I'm also highly skeptical that people will see any real effects from topically applied growth factors. These may show promise in cell cultures in the lab but this has not translated into actual topically applied products.
Some derms are better trained than others and while their advice about skin diseases and conditions is reliable, I'd have much less faith in their advice about daily skin care maintenance. They are easily misinformed & some are motivated to get you to buy into a marketing story so you buy products from them.
Thanks Perry. The derms also had a stake in the stem cell company soooo. But did spend a good amount of time telling me plant and human cells are the same. Red flag right away, but authority bias hit!
Here are my thoughts on the subject of stem cells in cosmetics. Basically, I think they are promising but the technology at the moment is simply a claims ingredient with little to no benefit.
I'm also highly skeptical that people will see any real effects from topically applied growth factors. These may show promise in cell cultures in the lab but this has not translated into actual topically applied products.
Some derms are better trained than others and while their advice about skin diseases and conditions is reliable, I'd have much less faith in their advice about daily skin care maintenance. They are easily misinformed & some are motivated to get you to buy into a marketing story so you buy products from them.
Thanks Perry. The derms also had a stake in the stem cell company soooo. But did spend a good amount of time telling me plant and human cells are the same. Red flag right away, but authority bias hit
Here are my thoughts on the subject of stem cells in cosmetics. Basically, I think they are promising but the technology at the moment is simply a claims ingredient with little to no benefit.
I'm also highly skeptical that people will see any real effects from topically applied growth factors. These may show promise in cell cultures in the lab but this has not translated into actual topically applied products.
Some derms are better trained than others and while their advice about skin diseases and conditions is reliable, I'd have much less faith in their advice about daily skin care maintenance. They are easily misinformed & some are motivated to get you to buy into a marketing story so you buy products from them.
Thanks Perry. The derms also had a stake in the stem cell company soooo. But did spend a good amount of time telling me plant and human cells are the same. Red flag right away, but authority bias hit
"The derms also had a stake in the stem cell company soooo. But did spend a good amount of time telling me plant and human cells are the same. Red flag right away, but authority bias hit!"
@Rockstargirl - I always wonder about the quality of any derm who needs to supplement their income by selling dubious anti-aging skin care lines.
"The derms also had a stake in the stem cell company soooo. But did spend a good amount of time telling me plant and human cells are the same. Red flag right away, but authority bias hit!"
@Rockstargirl - I always wonder about the quality of any derm who needs to supplement their income by selling dubious anti-aging skin care lines.
100% this. But they are also dancing on tiktok for soap. Perhaps dermatology doesn’t pay what it use too
Comments
Growth Factors are a different case and this is probably what the derms are focusing on.
See website for details www.desertinbloomcosmeticslab.com
Basically, I think they are promising but the technology at the moment is simply a claims ingredient with little to no benefit.
I'm also highly skeptical that people will see any real effects from topically applied growth factors. These may show promise in cell cultures in the lab but this has not translated into actual topically applied products.
Some derms are better trained than others and while their advice about skin diseases and conditions is reliable, I'd have much less faith in their advice about daily skin care maintenance. They are easily misinformed & some are motivated to get you to buy into a marketing story so you buy products from them.
FYI: I have leaves instead of ears if that helps you any
See website for details www.desertinbloomcosmeticslab.com
@Rockstargirl - I always wonder about the quality of any derm who needs to supplement their income by selling dubious anti-aging skin care lines.