Article by: Perry Romanowski
Chemists Corner is a podcast about cosmetic science and formulating.
Tony Abboud currently does Technical Sales and Special Projects at Botaneco. Tony graduated with a Bachelors of Science and Masters of Biomedical Technology, both from the University of Calgary, and joined Botaneco at the company’s inception in 2007. Tony is responsible for working with key strategic accounts and provides guidance for the company’s customer projects.
Todd Zielke is the Director of Sales and Marketing at Botanic. He has over 18 years experience in sales, marketing and business development in the health care sector. He spent 14 years at J&J.
Website : Botaneco website
Cosmetic Science Stories
Cosmetic Formulating Tips
Here’s an interesting trend that will affect cosmetic chemists and formulators in the future. More and more, natural ingredients are replacing standard cosmetic raw materials. What will this mean?
Cosmetic chemists will no doubt have to reformulate almost all the products that they have. Anything that contains a petroleum derivative will have to be re-worked to contain only plant and sustainable ingredients. This might seem like a lot of trouble but it is good news for formulators because it gives you some new opportunities to create new formulations.
One of the most frustrating aspects of being a cosmetic chemist is that you make very few changes to formulas. In truth, a company doesn’t want to stray too far from their existing formulations because using new raw materials requires more warehouse storage, raw material ingredient costs will increase because you are not buying in bulk as much and the stability and performance is less well known.
There are forces that work against creating truly new and innovative formulations.
Good for raw material suppliers
Raw material suppliers will also like this trend because they can more easily get chemists to start using new raw materials. One of the biggest challenges raw material suppliers face is that chemists do not like to use new raw materials. The reason is that they are unproven and almost always more expensive. Now, raw material companies will be able to sell new raw materials that are more profitable.
On the other hand, there are some problems with this new trend.
Not all positive
The biggest problem is that substitution of raw materials with new ones will not likely lead to improved products. In fact, it will probably lead to products that don’t work as well. It used to be that a cosmetic chemist would switch out a raw material for some performance reason. They discover that some raw material works better than their current so they make the switch. But with this trend, cosmetic chemists are switching out raw materials for a non-performance based reason. Naturally, performance will likely suffer.
But perhaps the worst aspect of this trend is that consumers will have to pay more money for formulations that do not work as well. They are the losers in this trend.
Although, one could argue that consumers are not paying enough for their cosmetics right now. They are not covering the cost that cosmetic use has on the environment and they should. So, perhaps the fact that consumers pay more for better sustainable products is overall a good thing. I’m just not sure consumers will agree with it.
Join the cosmetic science forum
Come to the NYSCC scientific seminar in New York! I’m doing a hair care seminar on Thursday morning.